Sanctions and Unilateral Restrictive Measures: The Problem of Differences in Terms and Identity of Phenomena
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2020-10-6-61-65
Abstract
The article considers approaches to the definition of sanctions by Russian and foreign authors. A large number of differing approaches suggests that there is still no consensus in political and legal science on how to define sanctions. The article also considers various approaches to the relationship between the concepts of “sanctions” and “restrictive measures”, as well as their analogues. There is also a divergence of approaches regarding this topic. The author comes to the conclusion that when analyzing political risks, such a separation of terms is counterproductive, agreeing with researchers who believe that there is no essential difference between the sanctions of international organizations and the measures of individual states.
About the Author
I. S. Pyatibratov
Financial University; Centre for Political Information
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan S. Pyatibratov — Assistant at the Department of Political Sciences, Analyst
Moscow
References
1. Kunz J. L. Sanctions in International Law. The American Journal of International Law. 1960;54(2):324–347.
2. Galtung J. On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions: With Examples from the Case of Rhodesia. World Politics. 1967;19(3):378–416.
3. Vasilenko V. A. International legal sanctions. Kiev, Head publishing house of the publishing association «Vischa School»; 1982. (In Russ.).
4. Baldwin D. A. The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice. International Security. 1999;(24):80–107.
5. Hufbauer G. C. Economic sanctions reconsidered. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics; 2007.
6. Kritsky K. V. The terms “international sanctions” and “unilateral restrictive measures”. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2016;(2):204–213. (In Russ.).
7. Kalinin A. V. UN economic sanctions and unilateral extraterritorial measures of economic coercion. Yurist-mezhdunarodnik. 2005;(4):30–37. (In Russ.).
8. Zhdanov Yu. N. Coercive Measures in International Law. Author’s abstract. Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.).
9. Lukashuk I. I. International responsibility law. Moscow: Walters Kluver; 2004. (In Russ.).
10. Giumelli F. Coercing, Constraining and Signalling: Explaining UN and EU Sanctions after the Cold War. ECPR Press; 2011.
11. Doraev M. G. Economic sanctions in the law of the United States, the European Union and Russia. Moscow: Infotropic Media; 2016. (In Russ.).
12. Keshner M. V. Economic sanctions in modern international law. Moscow: Publishing house “Prospect”; 2015. (In Russ.).
13. Rogozhina S. G. Sanction, general questions of theor y. Sinergiya nauk. 2020;(44):294–298. (In Russ.).
14. Borodaenko A. A. “Sanctions” and “measures” in international law: the problem of normative consolidation and interpretation. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2018;(5):127–130. (In Russ.).
15. Marynich S. V. Economic sanctions in international law. Author’s abstract. dis. Cand. jurid. sciences. Moscow; 1989. (In Russ.).
16. Conlon P. United Nations Sanctions Management: A Case of the Iraq Sanction Committee, 1990–1994. New York; 2000.
Review
For citations:
Pyatibratov I.S. Sanctions and Unilateral Restrictive Measures: The Problem of Differences in Terms and Identity of Phenomena. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2020;10(6):61-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2020-10-6-61-65
Views:
129
Email this article 