Reasoning about the Effectiveness of Cross-Cultural Communication in Modern Russian Science
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2020-10-5-71-78
Abstract
The article discusses the results of a qualitative and quantitative content analysis on the effectiveness of cross-cultural communication in Russian science. We highlighted the main models that consider cross-cultural communication as concerns its effectiveness. The authors attempt to systematise the components selected from the texts, which can then be divided into criteria, indicators, conditions, and products of effective intercultural communication. We concluded that in domestic science, exists the lack of study and refinement of the definition of the effectiveness of the MCC and the task of the methodological framework for systematisation of its evaluation criteria as well.
Keywords
effectiveness of cross-cultural communication,
cross-cultural communication,
effectiveness of communication,
performance criteria,
content analysis,
models of the MCC
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budget funds for the state task of the financial University in 2020
About the Authors
A. G. Tyurikov
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander G. Tyurikov, Doctor of Social Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department
Department of Sociology
Moscow
V. V. Diaghilev
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vasily V. Diaghilev, Cand. Sci. (History), Associate Professor
Department of Humanities
Moscow
T. V. Laptieva
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Laptieva, Research assistant
International Centre for Social Expertise and Development
Moscow
References
1. Kirpikov A. R. Qualitative content analysis as a research method. XXI International conference in memory of Professor L. N. Kogan “Culture, personality, society in the modern world: methodology, the experience of empirical research”. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University; 2018. (In Russ.).
2. Tyurikov A. G., Bolshunova S. A., Davydova T. S. Intercultural communication: science’s response to the challenges of regional practices. Samoupravlenie. 2019;4(117):333–336. (In Russ.).
3. Belozertsev, A. V. The parameters of the communicant in the communication models. Lingua mobilis. 2014;3(49):32–44. (In Russ.).
4. Okolnishnikova I. Yu. Analysis of approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of marketing communications. Vestnik of the YuURU. 2011;28(245):134–142. (In Russ.).
5. Nasibullin R. T., Fazlyev A. A. Matrix model of communication realizability. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya. 2010;8(62):533–539. (In Russ.).
6. Kartseva I. R. Polyfunctionality of the language of cross-cultural communication. Autoref. dis. … Cand. Philol. sciences’. Kazan; 2007. 19 p. (In Russ.).
7. Krasilnikov A. S. Models of intercultural communication: theoretical and practical aspects. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modeli-mezhkulturnoy-kommunikatsii-teoreticheskiy-i-prakticheskiy-aspekty. (In Russ.).
8. Ornatskaya L. A. Intercultural dialogue: problems and prospects of research. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhkulturnyy-dialog-problemy-i-perspektivy-issledovaniya. (In Russ.).
9. De Souza M., Ostapenko S. A. Transformation of multiculturalism as a strategy of intercultural communication of the XXI century. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/transformatsiya-multikulturalizma-kak-strategiya-mezhkulturnoy-kommunikatsii-hhi-veka. (In Russ.).
10. Fedchenko E. V. Communicative action and language models of communication: the problem of quality compatibility. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kommunikativnoe-deystvie-i-yazykovye-modeli-kommunikatsii-problema-kachestvennoy-sovmestimosti. (In Russ.).
11. Erofeeva M. A. Frame-analytical model of communication: opportunities and limitations. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/freym-analiticheskaya-model-kommunikatsii-vozmozhnosti-i-ogranicheniya. (In Russ.).
12. Leontovich O. A. System-dynamic model of intercultural communication between Russians and Americans. Dis. … Dr Philol. Sciences: 10.02.20. Volgograd; 2002. 502 p. (In Russ.).
13. Apollonov I. A., Chistilina I. A. The problem of intercultural dialogue in the framework of liberal and communitarian traditions. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problema-mezhkulturnogo-dialoga-v-ramkah-liberalnoy-i-kommunitaristskoy-traditsiy. (In Russ.).
14. Vorobyov V. V. The concept and the level model of a language personality. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptsii-i-urovnevaya-model-yazykovoy-lichnosti. (In Russ.).
15. Permyakova T. M. Modelling of the discourse of intercultural communication. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modelirovanie-diskursa-mezhkulturnoy-kommunikatsii. (In Russ.).
16. Bykov I. A., Gribanov V. V., Sidorskaya I. V. Basic model of communication between business and government: problems of theory and practice. Korporativnoe upravlenie i innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki severa. Vestnik nauchno-issledovatel’ skogo tsentra korporativnogo prava, upravleniya i venchurnogo investirovaniya Syktyvkarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015;(4):168–179. (In Russ.).
17. Bolshunov A. Ya., Tyurikov A. G., Bolshunova S. A. Intercultural communication: challenges of the global transformation of lifeworlds. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2019;(6):6–10. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Tyurikov A.G., Diaghilev V.V., Laptieva T.V. Reasoning about the Effectiveness of Cross-Cultural Communication in Modern Russian Science. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2020;10(5):71-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2020-10-5-71-78
Views:
110
Email this article 