Experience of Material and Non-material Incentives for Teachers in Russian and Foreign Universities: Objectives, Methods and Results

Universities, which prepare highly qualified personnel and thus influence the competitiveness of a country and its position in the international community, are constantly subject to scientific analysis. This analysis has the aim to identify problematic situations, search for ways to eliminate them and to develop systems of measures to improve the quality of education. A number of problems in higher education are associated with teachers, who are key participants in the educational process. Opinion polls indicate their dissatisfaction with wages, distrust of the point-rating system that affects their financial remuneration, and a lack of internal motivation to do their work at the required level. Emotional burnout due to heavy workloads and lack of free time is also a problem. These and other issues are more or less common in both Russian and foreign universities. Methods of material and non-material incentives are used to retain teachers in the profession and to increase their productivity. Therefore, the question of which ones are the most effective is of fundamental importance for the proper organization of higher education work. However, at the moment, there is no scientific theory on stimulating teachers’ work, and experts have different, often opposing, views on this issue. The authors of this article identify factors that can help keep teachers in the profession and encourage them to increase their labor productivity.

1. Gutsu E. G., Nyagolova M. D., Runova T. A. Study of motivation for work activity of a university teacher. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Minin University. 2018;6(3):13. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26795/2307–1281–2018–6–3–13

2. Ilyina I. Yu. Professional burnout of university teachers: factors of occurrence and methods of prevention. Ekonomika. Sociologiya. Pravo = Economy. Sociology. Right. 2022;3(27):22–27. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22281/2542–1697–2022–01–03–22–27

3. Stirling D. Teacher Motivation. Aichi Universities English Education Research Journal. 2014;(33):11–28.

4. Klimova E. K., Chernysheva T. E. Analysis of current problems of higher education in Russia and possible solutions. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya = International Journal of Experimental Education. 2017;(5):71–74.

5. With M. L. Are Teachers Increasingly Leaving the Profession? Professions and Professionalism. 2017;7(1):17–23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/pp.1723

6. Pugach V. F. Once again about the age of teachers in Russian universities: old problems and new trends. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher education in Russia. 2023;32(3):118–133. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31992/0869–3617–2023–32–3–118–133

7. Shuklina E. A., Pevnaya M. V., Shirokova E. A. Adaptation potential of teachers of the “silver age” in the conditions of changes in higher education. Obrazovanie i nauka = Education and Science. 2020;22(1):146–169. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17853/1994–5639–2020–1–146–169

8. Petruk G. V. Methodological aspects of assessing the quality of university teaching staff. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: ekonomika i upravlenie = Azimuth of scientific research: economics and management. 2019;8(2–27):289–291. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26140/anie-2019–0802–0070

9. Litvinyuk A. A., Zhigun L. A., Polevaya M. V., Kamneva E. V. Application of theory to the analysis of organizational behavior of university teachers. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Creative economy. 2018;12(2):215–226. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/ce.12.2.38817

10. Matveev V. V., Soboleva Yu. P. Managing the process of motivating university staff using a strategic approach. Gosudarstvennoe i municipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski = State and municipal administration. Scientific notes. 2020(3):28–32. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/2079–1690–2020–1–3–28–41

11. Gibadulina A. S., Kamneva E. V. Material incentives for university teachers: foreign practice. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Economics: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2020;10(2A):249–255. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.10.80.023

12. Bagdasarova D. G. Integral assessment of the effectiveness of simulating the work activity of employees of higher professional education. Vestnik Instituta ekonomicheskih issledovanij = Bulletin of the Institute of Economic Research. 2021;3(23):84–95. (In Russ.).

13. Shatilov A. B. “Generation gaps” as a factor in the growth of conflict in modern Russian society. Vlast’ = Power. 2019;(4):26–32. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v27i4.6581

14. Stipek D. Motivation and Instruction. In: Handbook of Educational Psychology. URL: https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=2522061

15. Simic N., Puric D., Stancic M. Motivation for the teaching profession: Assessing psychometric properties and factorial validity of the Orientation for Teaching Survey on in-service teachers. Psihologia. 2018;(1):1–23. DOI: 10.2298/PSI170327012S

16. Galushkin A. A. History of research into the motivation of teaching staff in higher education abroad. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019;(1):256–259. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2073–0454–2019–10060

17. Ryan R., Deci E. From Ego Depletion to Vitality: Theory and Findings Concerning the Facilitation of Energy Available to the Self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2008;2(2):702–717. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751–9004.2008.00098.x

18. Belov V. G., Parfenov Yu.A., Kosinova E. P., Gibova I. M. Motivational characteristics of the teaching staff of a higher educational institution. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P. F. Lesgaft = Scientific notes of the University named after. P. F. Lesgaft. 2014;6(112):24–28. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.5930/issn.1994–4683.2014.06.112

19. Schieb L. J., & Karabenick S. A. Teacher Motivation and Professional Development: A Guide to Resources. URL: https://pdf4pro.com/view/teacher-motivation-and-professional-development-29fad5.html

20. Prosalova V. S., Nikolaeva A. A. Methods and tools for non-material incentives for teaching staff at a medical university. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: ekonomika i upravlenie = Azimuth of scientific research: economics and management. 2023;12(2–43):59–62. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.57145/27128482–2023–12–02–12

21. Rusakov A. A., Kuzekevich V. R. Motivations for the moral nature of the professional activities of university teachers. Pedagogicheskij IMIDZH = Pedagogical IMAGE. 2022;16(4–57):494–501. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32343/2409–5052–2022–16–4–494–501

22. Liventsova E. Yu., Obukhovskaya V. B., Fakhretdinova A. P., Larionova A. V., Malkova I. Yu. — Organization and conditions of professional activity of a teacher: a comparative analysis of work experience in Russian and foreign universities. Pedagogika i prosveshchenie = Pedagogy and education. 2021(1):36–49. DOI: 10.7256/2454–0676.2021.1.34742

23. Liu S., & Onwuegbuzie A. J. Teachers’ motivation for entering the teaching profession and their job satisfaction: A cross-cultural comparison of China and other countries. Learning Environments Research. 2014;17(1):75–94. DOI: 10.1007/s10984–013–9155–5.