Subjective Matrix оf Vertical Political Communication
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-6-62-69
Abstract
The article provides a brief overview of various aspects of research into subjects of political communication, analyzing their key characteristics and distinctive features. The authors introduce their own typology of political communication through the construction of a vertically integrated communication matrix. The key characteristics of each type of political communication and the main subjects of communication, their goals and degree of nativeness are described in detail. In the course of the study, the authors come to the conclusion that the leading role in the subject matrix is played by the dominant type of political communication, where the main actor is the highest official of the state.
About the Authors
Dz. F. Aliev
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dzhomart F. Aliev — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), First Vice-Rector.
Moscow
V. E. Sarkisov
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vartan E. Sarkisov — Postgraduate Student of the Department of Political Science and Applied Political Work.
Moscow
References
1. Aliyev D. F., Sarkisov V. E. General principles of the organization of the landscape of political communications in modern Russia. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(5):27–32. DOI: 10.26794/2226–7867–2023–13–5–27–32 (In Russ.).
2. Wolfsfeld G., Schiffer T. Competing stories and the construction of political news: the struggle for the waves in Israel. Political communication. 2006;23(3):333–354. DOI: 10.1080/10584600600808927
3. Easton D. Fundamentals of political analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979; 142 p.
4. Deutsch K. Political cybernetics: a model and perspective. Freiburg: Rombach; 1969. 366 p.
5. Vitol de Wenden S. Immigrants as political actors in France. Western European politics. 1994;17(2):91– 109. DOI: 10.1080/01402389408425016
6. Semin M. I. The Jewish Diaspora in Moscow as a subject of political communications. Collection of articles by participants of the 7th Interuniversity scientific and practical Conference of graduate students. Moscow: Moscow City Pedagogical University; 2020. (In Russ.).
7. Kalugina E. G. Internet media as a subject of political communication: key characteristics. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki = Questions of the theory and practice of journalism. 2017;6(3):406–417. DOI: 10.17150/2308–6203.2017.6(3) .406–417. (In Russ.).
8. Sarasov E. A. Regional press as a systemic subject and mediator of political communication. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/regionalnaya-pressa-kak-sistemnyy-subekt-i-posrednik-politicheskoykommunikatsii (In Russ.).
9. Gutorov V. A. The media as a subject of the political process: the evolution of Western conceptual approaches in the second half of the twentieth century. (Part 1). Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Obshchestvennye nauki = Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Series 3. Social Sciences. 2013;8(3):130–144. (In Russ.).
10. Long N. The local community as the ecology of games. American Journal of Sociology. 1958;64(3):246–258. DOI: 10.1086/222468
11. McCombs M., Shaw D. The function of the media in shaping the agenda. Public opinion is formed quarterly. 1972;36(2):176–187.
12. Kostinevich K. I. Higher state authorities as subjects of political communication between the government and society in the Republic of Belarus. Nauchnye trudy BGEU = Scientific works of BSEU. 2021;(14):645– 654. (In Russ.).
13. Pridham G. Political actors, connections and interactions: Democratic consolidation in Southern Europe. Western European politics. 1990;13(4):103–117. DOI: 10.1080/01402389008424822
14. Debus M. Analysis of party politics in Germany using new approaches to assessing the political preferences of political actors. German politics. 2009;18(3):281–300. DOI: 10.1080/09644000903055773
15. Matsuoka M. The role of informal political actors in shaping Japan’s security policy: the case of Kitaoka Shinichi. The Australian Journal of International Relations. 2020;74(6):670–686. DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2020.1781786
Review
For citations:
Aliev D.F., Sarkisov V.E. Subjective Matrix оf Vertical Political Communication. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(6):62-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-6-62-69
Views:
352
Email this article 