Peculiarities of Youth Perception of a Political Leader’s Image in the Media
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-5-135-140
Abstract
The surrounding reality is perceived by a person not in the way it really is, but in the form of images. We rarely think about why one image is easy to remember, while another one is more difficult and whereas the third one does not linger in memory at all. Under the influence of various circumstances, a certain assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of a political leader is formed and fixed in mind, which forces him to act in accordance with public expectations. This article studies the relationship between the image of a politician in print media and his perception by young people using the example of G. A. Yavlinsky.
About the Author
O. V. Fedorishcheva
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oxana V. Fedorishcheva — Associate Professor of the Department of Mass Communications and Media Business
Moscow
References
1. Andreev A. Political psychology. Moscow: Yurayt; 2002. (In Russ.).
2. Egorova-Gantman E.V., Pleshkov K. V. Political advertising. Moscow: Center for Political Consulting “Nikolo M”; 1999. (In Russ.).
3. Levada Yu. The phenomenon of power in public opinion: paradoxes and stereotypes of perception. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya = Monitoring of public opinion. 1998;(5):9–15. (In Russ.).
4. Zakharov A. Folk images of power. Polis = Policy. 1998;(1):23–36.
5. Inglehart R. Postmodernity: Changing Values and Changing Societies. Polis = Policy. 1997;(4):6–33. (In Russ.).
6. Diligensky G. G. Socio-political psychology. Moscow: Nauka; 1994. (In Russ.).
7. Gozman L. Ya., Shestopal E. B. Political psychology. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix; 1996. (In Russ.).
8. Shestopal E. B. Psychological profile of Russian politics at the turn of the 90s. Moscow: ROSSPEN; 2000. (In Russ.).
9. Gordeeva O. I. Political image in the election campaign. Technology and organization of elective companies. Foreign and domestic experience. Moscow: Rossijskaya akademiya upravleniya; 1993. (In Russ.).
10. Oslon A. Sociology and Television. The Political Power of television: the reality of the myth? Polis = Policy. 1994;(6):155–179. (In Russ.).
11. Dzyaloshinsky I. Russian mass media in the election campaign: lessons of efficiency. Moscow: Studiya “Vikon”; 1995. (In Russ.).
12. Zadorin I., Burova Yu., Syutkina A. Mass media and mass political consciousness: mutual influence and interdependence. URL: http://www.mediasprut.ru/info/bibliothek/ru/smi-polit.shtml?ysclid=lot2zn9uwi592953333 (In Russ.).
13. Kinder D., Peters M., Abelson R., Fiske S. Presidential prototypes. Political behavior. 1980;(2):315–338.
14. Egorova E. V. Psychological methods of personality research of political leaders of capitalist countries. Moscow: Iskan; 1988. (In Russ.).
15. Abashkina E. B., Kosolapova Yu. N. On theories of leadership in modern political psychology. SSHA: ekonomika, politika, ideologiya = USA: economics, politics, ideology. 1993;(4):31–21. (In Russ.).
16. Kindle D., Fiske S. Incidents in the Republic mind. Роlitiсаl psychology. 1984;(1):193–218.
17. Ashin G. K. Criticism of modern bourgeois concepts of leadership. Moscow: Mysl’; 1978. (In Russ.).
18. Uznadze D. N. Theory of installation. Moscow: Institut prakticheskoj psihologii; 1997. (In Russ.).
19. Himmelweit H. How Voters Decide? L.: Academic Press; 1981.
Review
For citations:
Fedorishcheva O.V. Peculiarities of Youth Perception of a Political Leader’s Image in the Media. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(5):135-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-5-135-140
Views:
269
Email this article 