Competencies and competence in the light of english teacher ratings
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-c-136-140
Abstract
The article looks upon criteria for teacher assessment surveys. The author emphasizes subjectivity of teacher ratings and highlights theoretical and pragmatic causes of academic interest to this theme. An opinion about the destructive effect caused by the predominance of personal characteristics on the list of questions for teacher assessment surveys is expressed. The author states that there is a need to reconsider the questions on the basis of purely professional criteria for language teachers’ skills. Criteria developed by Cambridge University (the DELTA course) are discussed and a comparative analysis of these criteria and the questions of the survey “Teacher Rating” of Financial University is conducted. New wordings and questions are suggested.
About the Author
A. Yu. Shirokikh
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna Yu. Shirokikh — Cand. Sci. (Philology), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of English for Professional Communication
Moscow
References
1. Vokueva T. S. Modern Russian University Image in the Mirror of Opinions of Lecturers and Students (on the Example of the Financial University). Gumanitarnye Nauki. Vestnik Finasovogo Universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(4):128–132. (In Russ.).
2. Chikileva L. S. Characteristic Features of Pedagogical Interaction in Teaching a Foreign Language at a Non-linguistic University. Gumanitarnye Nauki. Vestnik Finasovogo Universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;(12):119–123. (In Russ.).
3. Belyaev V. V., Sharok V. V. Analysis of Students’ Survey «Prepodavatel’ glazami studenta». Sovremennye aspekty ekonomiki = Modern Aspects of Economics. 2014;12(208):132–135. (In Russ.).
4. Zamaraeva E. I. Problems of Humanitarian Knowledge in the Era of Total Digitalization. Gumanitarnye Nauki. Vestnik Finasovogo Universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(4):45–50. (In Russ.).
5. Medvedeva M. S. Higher Education Instructor in Modern Realia: The Image in Students’ eyes. Nauchnyj poisk: lichnost, obrazovanie, kultura = Scientific search: Personality, Education, Culture. 2022;(3):43–49. (In Russ.).
6. Kolmykov A. V., Trapyanok N. G. «Prepodavatel glazami studenta» as an Element of Monitoring and Managing Quality of Training in Agricultural Education. Nauka i Obrazovanie = Science and Education. 2020;3(1):29. (In Russ.).
7. Marihin S. V. , Kosenkova L. E. The Image of Lecturer in Students’ eyes. Scholars’ Memoranda. 2022;1(1):143–145. (In Russ.).
8. Shirokih A. Yu. Teaching Writing: The Comparative Analysis of Lingvodidactic Approaches. Obshchestvo: sociologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy. 2022;(12):329–337.
Review
For citations:
Shirokikh A.Yu. Competencies and competence in the light of english teacher ratings. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(2):136-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-c-136-140
Views:
173
Email this article 