EP classroom evaluation practices in higher educational institutions
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-c-78-83
Abstract
The paper approaches the issue of foreign language teachers’ classroom evaluation activity also known as formative assessment. The authors review the distinctions between conventional and formative assessment techniques and prove that formative assessment has certain advantages. It can be successfully used to evaluate the current students’ progress long before examination and to take timely organizational and methodological corrective actions. Such type of assessment is student-centric, provides an individual approach to training, produces a positive effect on classroom environment, specifically teacher-student relationship. Consequently it enhances the students’ motivation to ESP learning and benefits learning outcome. The article provides certain examples of ESP classroom evaluation practices and recommendations on using them.
About the Authors
N. G. Kondrakhina
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalya G. Kondrakhina — Cand. Sci. (Philology), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of English for Professional Communications
Moscow
O. N. Petrova
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oksana N. Petrova — Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Associate Professor, Assistant Professor of the Department of English for Professional Communications
Moscow
References
1. Vygodskyi L. S. The Problem of Higher Mental Functions Development and Decay. Defectology Problems. Moscow: Prosvesheniye Publishing House; 1995. (In Russ.).
2. Zemlyanskaya E. N. Criteria based assessment of higher school students’ educational achievements. Pedagogika. Voprocy Teorii i Practitki = Pedagogy. Theory and Practice. 2020; 5(2):142–147. (In Russ.).
3. Cattell R. B. Structured personality-learning theory: A Holistic Multivariate Research Approach (Centennial psychology series). New York: Praeger; 1983. 466 р.
4. Zagoruyko T. V., Didenko S. Yu., Cherepanskaya U. I. at al. The Notion of Assessment in Education. Molodoy Ucheniy = Young Scientist. 2018; 45(231):240–242. (In Russ.).
5. Mirolyubov A. A. The methodology of Teaching Foreign languages: Traditions and Modernity. Obninsk: Titul Publishing House; 2010. 210p. (In Russ.).
6. Dubinina G. A., Kamenskaya N. V. Searching New Forms of Control and Assessment of Foreign Language Proficiency in Non Linguistic University. Vestnik of MGLU = Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and Teaching. 2018;(2):202–211. (In Russ.).
7. Dauletkulova D. What is formative assessment and how it improves teaching and learning? URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chto-takoe-formativnoe-otsenivanie-i-kakim-obrazom-ono-uluchshaet-prepodavanie-i-obuchenie
8. Chandra M. Y., Baykina E. A. Strategies of Higher Education Students’ competence assessment. Izvestya VGPU. = Ivzestia of the Volgograd State PedagogicalUniversity. 2018:10–14. (In Russ.).
9. Crooks T. J. The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students. Review of Educational Research. 1988;(58):438–481.
10. Agaltsova D. V., Agoshkova A. V., Anyushenkova O. N., Belogash M. A., Bugreeva A. S., Vinnikova O. A. at al. Foreign languages in Higher School: New Reality. Monograph. Moscow: Prometey; 2022. 368 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kondrakhina N.G., Petrova O.N. EP classroom evaluation practices in higher educational institutions. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(2):78-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-c-78-83
Views:
233
Email this article 