Influence of intrapersonal conflict on women’s consumer behavior
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-6-81-87
Abstract
The research aimed at testing hypotheses about the link between various types of internal conflict and women’s impulse purchases. The most detailed consideration is the value-semantic conflict as a phenomenon caused by the interaction of the most important personal structures. The author studied consumer values, subjective financial and personal well-being, as well as varieties of irrational consumer behavior as additional ones: conspicuous consumption and orientation towards materialism. The paper revealed the consistency between certain types of internal conflict of the individual and a certain type of impulse consumer behavior. The patterns found open a wide scope for further development of this problem by introducing additional personality constructs, expanding the sample, and using more accurate diagnostic instruments.
About the Authors
T. A. Subtselnaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Subtselnaya — Postgraduate student, Department of Political Economy
Moscow
V. A. Negriy
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Varvara A. Negriy — Postgraduate student, Department of Educational Technologies
Moscow
References
1. Barinova N. V. Transformation of consumer behavior: History and modernity. Bulletin of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2018;3(99):140–146. (In Russ.).
2. Tarasova T. V. The standard concept of consumer behavior in a market economy. Politics and society. 2013;7(103):834–842. (In Russ.).
3. Kotler Ph., Armstrong G. Principles of Marketing. URL: http://swastapriambada.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2013/04/Kotler_Principlesofmarketing.pdf
4. Schwartz I. S. The study of consumer behavior and social validity: An essential partnership for applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1991;(24):241–244.
5. Medvedeva O. S., Kisioglo T. V. Ways to influence consumer behavior. Innovative economy and modern management. 2020;2(28):16–21. (In Russ.).
6. Kozyrev G. I. Conflictology. Intrapersonal conflicts. Social and humanitarian knowledge. 1999;(2):102–111. (In Russ.).
7. Krasilnikov I. A. Psychoanalytic model of intrapersonal conflict. Bulletin of the University. 2012;(19):224–230. (In Russ.).
8. Agapova T. A. The essence of intrapersonal conflicts. Alley of Science. 2018;2(18):33–345. (In Russ.).
9. Beattie H. J., Friese S. Objects, Decision Considerations and Self-Image in Men’s and Women’s Impulse Purchases. Acta Psychologica. 2000;93(1–3):187–206.
10. Antsupov A. Ya. Shipilov A. I. Conflictology. Moscow: Unity; 1999. 551 p. (In Russ.).
11. Fantalova E. B. Diagnosis and psychotherapy of internal conflict. Samara: BAHRAKH-M; 2001. 128 p. (In Russ.).
12. Posypanova O. S. Economic psychology: Psychological aspects of consumer behavior. Kaluga: Publishing House of the KGU named after K. E. Tsiolkovsky; 2012. 296 p. (In Russ.).
13. Stepanova L. G. Psychological diagnostics of personality gender characteristics. Mozyr: Assistance; 2006. 72 p. (In Russ.).
14. Leontiev D. A. Test of meaningful life orientations. 2nd ed. Moscow: Meaning; 2000. 18 p. (In Russ.).
15. Sokolova M. V. The scale of subjective well-being: Guidance. Yaroslavl: SPC “Psychodiagnostics”; 1996. 11 p. (In Russ.).
16. Khashchenko V. A. Psychology of economic well-being. Moscow: Publishing House “Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences”; 2012. 432 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Subtselnaya T.A., Negriy V.A. Influence of intrapersonal conflict on women’s consumer behavior. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(6):81-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-6-81-87
Views:
344
Email this article 