Contentment with the Quality of Students’ Education of Russian Universities in a Pandemic (on the Example of the Financial University)
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-4-123-127
Abstract
The paper reveals the features of contentment with the quality of education in higher educational institutions of the Russian Federation during the pandemic. The emphasis is on the forced transition first to the distance learning format of higher educational institutions in Russia, and then to the hybrid format chosen by some universities. The authors reveal the importance of conducting research aimed at studying satisfaction with the quality of education. The paper presents the data of scientific research characterizing the attitude of students and teachers to online classes. Also, there are described the advantages and disadvantages that the informants encountered during the distance learning format, and the disciplines that are especially difficult to conduct on online platforms are also highlighted. The authors paid particular attention to the results of a monitoring study on satisfaction with the quality of education of the Educational Sociological Laboratory of the Department of Sociology of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. The analysis of the research was based on compiling indices using its own calculation method. It is presented as a general index of contentment with the quality of education for the entire university, by courses and by the basis of education, as well as indices separately for full-time and online formats for conducting various groups of disciplines.
About the Authors
K. S. Bilukha
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ksenia S. Bilukha — 3rd year student, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications; Research assistant at the Educational and Scientific Sociological Laboratory of the Department of Sociology
Moscow
M. R. Danilova
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Milena R. Danilova — 3rd year student, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications; Research assistant at the Educational and Scientific Sociological Laboratory of the Department of Sociology
Moscow
References
1. Subbotina T.N. The role of public opinion and informal professional norms in improving the quality of education. Education management: Theory and practice. 2020;3(39):49–56. (In Russ.).
2. Belova A. Universities and schools are testing blended learning formats. URL: https://rg.ru/articles/microsoft/. (In Russ.).
3. Belokon O.V., Belova N. Yu. Satisfaction with the quality of educational services of secondary vocational education as a managerial problem. Pedagogical education in Russia. 2018; (6):22–27. (In Russ.).
4. Tanova A. G., Evseeva L. I., Pozdeeva E. G., Trostinskaya I.R. Subjective aspects of monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of education (based on materials from the Center for Sociological Research of SPbPU). Society. Communication. Education. 2018;(1):90–102. (In Russ.).
5. Chistyakova V.A., Bulavin V.V. On the issue of quality management of education in the university using the results of monitoring student satisfaction with the conditions of education. Information and education: The boundaries of INFO communications. 2018;10(18):37–39. (In Russ.).
6. Obraztsov I.V., Polovnev A.V., Dmitrieva M. M. Dynamics of student satisfaction with the quality of education (on the example of a monitoring study at MSLU). Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Social Sciences. 2021;4(845):256–272. (In Russ.).
7. Zotova V.A. International experience of student participation in education quality assessment. Creative economy. 2017;11(3):303–314. (In Russ.).
8. Davletova A.A., Alekseev O.A. Distance learning. Achievements of science and education. 2021;1(73):35–38. (In Russ.).
9. Bolgova V.V., Garanin M.A., Krasnova E.A., Khristoforova L.V. Education after the pandemic: Fall or preparation for the jump? Higher education in Russia. 2021;(7):9–31. (In Russ.).
10. Sukhanova E.A., Frumin I. D. The quality of education in Russian universities: What we understood during the pandemic: Analytical report. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publishing House; 2021. 46 p. (In Russ.).
11. Rakachev D. N. University in a pandemic: Distance learning in the assessments of teachers and students. South Russian Journal of Social Sciences. 2020;(4):103–121. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Bilukha K.S., Danilova M.R. Contentment with the Quality of Students’ Education of Russian Universities in a Pandemic (on the Example of the Financial University). Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(4):123-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-4-123-127
Views:
390
Email this article 