Basic social ontology and value orientations of modern russian youth: Political self-identification problem
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-4-97-103
Abstract
This paper considers the analysis of the political self-identification of modern Russian youth. The author emphasizes the special role of the value-semantic sphere in the process of self-identification, as it produces political symbols and forms an attitude towards them. The study proves that of the two ways of perceiving information — cognitive and evaluative — the latter prevails in the process of political self-identification. The social environment in which young people live actively supported this trend. As a result, the processes of political self-identification of modern Russian youth are incomplete and have contextually labile features.
About the Author
D. D. OsininaRussian Federation
Daria D. Osinina — 3rd year PhD student, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications
Moscow
References
1. Giddens E. The consequences of modernity. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Praxis; 2011. (In Russ.).
2. Giddens E. The elusive world: How globalization turns our lives. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: The whole world; 2004. (In Russ.).
3. Bauman Z. Individualized society. Moscow: Logos; 2002. (In Russ.).
4. Polyakova N.L. “Identity” in modern sociological theory. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/235243581.pdf. (In Russ.).
5. Political sociology. Evgenieva T.V., ed. Moscow: Yurait; 2018. (In Russ.).
6. Lysak I.V. Features of self-identification of a person in the conditions of modern society. Humanitarian and socioeconomic sciences. 2008;(6):37–42. (In Russ.).
7. Parishioners A., Tolstykh N. Psychology of adolescence. Moscow: Yurait; 2016. (In Russ.).
8. Radaković A. Peoples and nations: cultural and political collective self-identification. National Identities. 2021;23(2):109–126. DOI: 10.1080/14608944.2019.1696763
9. Dumler D.A. Political and civil identity of libertarians in modern Russia: Problems and prospects. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science. 2021;23(4):560–569. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313–1438–2021– 23–4–560–569
10. Castells M. New individual mass media. Free thought. 2006;(5):62–67. (In Russ.).
11. Danilova E.N., Yadov V.A. Unstable social identity as a norm of modern societies. SocIs. 2004;(10):27–30. (In Russ.).
12. Toffler E. The Third Wave. Moscow: LLC “Publishing house AST”; 2004. (In Russ.).
13. Castells M. Information Age: Economics, Society and Culture. Moscow: State University Higher School of Economics; 2000. (In Russ.).
14. Conover P.J. & Feldman S. The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications. American Journal of Political Science. 1981;25(4):617–645.
15. Erikson Robert S., Norman R. Luttbeg, and Kent L. Tedin. American public opinion: Its origins, content and impact. New York: Wiley; 1980.
Review
For citations:
Osinina D.D. Basic social ontology and value orientations of modern russian youth: Political self-identification problem. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(4):97-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-4-97-103