Specific Features of Teaching Generation Z English in a Non-linguistic University (Based on the example of students majoring in public relations)

This research aims to identify the specifics of teaching generation Z English as a foreign language in Russian non- linguistic universities and covers the principles of the theory of generations including focus group methodology. The survey encompassed eighty-seven undergraduate freshmen majoring in Advertising and Public Relations and included the following key aspects: professor’s qualifications and behavior, overall atmosphere and lesson structure, frequency of utilization of audio and visual materials as well as students’ preferred forms of interaction. Contrary to the belief that generation Z is not sociable and prefers individualism, our survey highlights those students willingly interact in groups of several people maintaining their motivation and realizing creative potential. Employment of digital technologies plays a crucial role for generation Z as it contributes to the widespread implementation of pedagogical and methodological principles, by making a lesson more interesting for nowadays students consequently reducing the generation gap.

1. Strauss W., Howe N. Generations: the history of America`s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Morrow; 1991. 538 р.

2. Leontieva T. I., Kotenko S. N. Features of teaching a foreign language to generation Z: traditions and innovation. Territory of new opportunities. Bulletin of the Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. 2017;(1):152–158. (In Russ.).

3. Aleksyuk Yu.O. Development of creativity among students of generation Z in the digital environment. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University. 2019;(2):85–90. (In Russ.).

4. Frison E., Eggermont S. Exploring the Relationships Between Different Types of Facebook Use, Perceived Online Social Support, and Adolescents’ Depressed Mood. Social Science Computer Review. 2015;34(2):153–171.

5. Starkova D. A., Esenova E. P. Digital technologies in teaching English grammar. Actual problems of German studies, romance and Russian studies. 2021;(3):97–100. (In Russ.).

6. Hitchens M. A gamification design for the classroom. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. 2018;15(1):28–45.

7. Karmova M. R. “Gamify”, or why modern education needs games (on the example of students studying in the areas of “Sociology” and “Political Science”). Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2020;10(1):46–50. (In Russ.).

8. Kukarskaya G. A., Pakhomova V. N., Trifonova I. S. The use of visual sources for the development of written foreign language communicative competence among students. Higher education today. 2020;(6):37–43. (In Russ.).

9. Artamonova G. V. Problems in the process of teaching a foreign language to students of non-linguistic specialties. Science vector of Togliatti State University. 2015;(3):289–294. (In Russ.).

10. Tammy M., Fajardo J., Argudo M. Language and Teaching Methodology Features of CLIL in University Classrooms: A Research. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal. 2020;22(1):40–54.