A Look at Intercultural Communication as the Interaction of Lifeworlds and Overcoming the Crisis of Trust
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-1-80-89
Abstract
The article is devoted to the scientific heritage of Andrei Yakovlevich Bolshunov, a thinker, scientist, and mentor who made an outstanding contribution to science and didactics. The article examines the role of intercultural communication in the sociocultural sphere as a basic one for other spheres of society’s life, including politics, education, science, and economics. In this paper, we presented the authors’ model of intercultural communication in the sociocultural sphere in the form of a map of the lifeworlds. Under the term ‘lifeworld’, we understood by the authors as an intersubjective shared everyday world of the individual. Analysis of the relationship between sociocultural lifeworlds in dynamics makes it possible to ascertain the presence of transformations, decentrations, reassembly of social, global tensions. Overcoming the crisis of confidence, reducing international tension, according to the authors, is possible through the creation of a common global lifeworld. Finally, we propose a specific practices that contribute to creating a space of intersubjectively shared meanings, deliberative activities based on the model of absolute hospitality and the circulation of gifts.
About the Authors
S. A. Bolshunovaa
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sofia Andreevna Bolshunova - Junior Research Fellow, International Center for Social Expertise and Development
Moscow
A. G. Tyurikov
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander Georgievich Tyurikov - Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Sociology
Moscow
References
1. Benton R. Economics as a Cultural System. Journal of Economic Issues. 1982;16(2):461–469.
2. Sedlacek T. The economy of good and evil. In search of the meaning of Economics from Gilgamesh to Wall Street. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2016. 544 p. (In Russ.).
3. Sadokhin A. P. Introduction to the theory of intercultural communication (for bachelors). Moscow: KnoRus; 2016. 254 p. (In Russ.).
4. Hofstede G. Cultures and organisations: Software of the Mind. NY: McGraw-Hill; 1991. 246 p.
5. Izhikova N. V. Culture and politics. Methodological problems. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological research. 2007;(5):95–103. (In Russ.).
6. Mikheeva N. A. Social management as a factor in the development of the sociocultural sphere. State management. Electronic bulletin. 2008;(14). URL: http://e-journal.spa.msu.ru/uploads/vestnik/2008/vipusk_14._mart_2008_g./mikheeva.pdf. (In Russ.).
7. Huntington S. The clash of civilisations. Moscow: Publishing House-AST; 2003. 603 p. (In Russ.).
8. Inglehart R. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review. 2000;65(1):19–51.
9. Danilevsky N. Ya. Russia and Europe. Moscow: Institute of Russian Civilization; 2008. 816 p. (In Russ.).
10. Ten Yu. P. Analysis of descriptive and prescriptive models of intercultural communications in the socioeconomic sphere. Filosofiya i kul’tura sotsiuma: podkhody, kontseptsii, mneniya = Philosophy and culture of society: approaches, concepts, opinions. 2021;21(3):78–87. (In Russ.).
11. Habermas Yu. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 2001. 379 p. (In Russ.).
12. Gnatenko P. I. National psychology. Monograph. Dnipro: Poligrafist, 2000. 213 p. (In Russ.).
13. Bolshunov A. Ya., Bolshunova S. A., Tyurikov A. G. Intercultural communication: challenges of the global transformation of lifeworlds. Gumanitarnye Nauki. Vestnik Finasovogo Universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019;9(6(42):6–9. (In Russ.).
14. Briggs J., Sharp J. Indigenous knowledges and development: a postcolonial caution. Third World Quarterly. 2004;25(4):661–676.
15. Habermas Yu. The inclusion of the Other. Essays of political theory. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 2001. 417 p. (In Russ.).
16. Weizsaecker E., Wijkman A. Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. Springer; 2018. 220 p.
17. Foucault M. Hermeneutics of the subject. A course of lectures delivered at the Collège de France in 1981–1982. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 2007. 677 p. (In Russ.).
18. Derrida J. Of hospitality. Anne Dufourmantelle invites Jacques Derrida to respond; translated by Rachel Bowlby. Stanford; 2000. 162 p.
19. Avtonomova N. S. The philosophical language of Jacques Derrida. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia; 2011. 510 p. (In Russ.).
20. Malinovsky B. Favorites: Argonauts of the western part of the Pacific Ocean. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN); 2004. 552 p. (In Russ.).
21. Smith A. R. Phenomenology of Intercultural Communication. URL: https://www.academia.edu/7282485/Phenomenology_of_Intercultural_Communication
22. Derrida J., Marion J. About the gift: a discussion between Jacques Derrida and Jean Luc Marion. Philosophical and literary magazine “Logos”. 2011;3(82). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-dare-diskussiya-mezhduzhakom-derrida-i-zhanlyukom-marionom. (In Russ.).
23. Baudrillard J. On the criticism of political economy of the sign. Moscow: Academic Project; 2007. 335 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Bolshunovaa S.A., Tyurikov A.G. A Look at Intercultural Communication as the Interaction of Lifeworlds and Overcoming the Crisis of Trust. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(1):80-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-1-80-89
Views:
363
Email this article 