Prospects of Humanitarian Education: From Subject to System Rationality
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-4-102-110
Abstract
The article examines the current issues of reducing the multi-vector nature of modern humanities education while maintaining the key models of educational practice. The article deals with the evolution of Russian humanities education in connection with the internal and external logic of development associated with the transformation of geopolitical conditions. The existing and possible trajectories of changes in humanities education are analyzed. A comparative analysis of non-classical and post-nonclassical humanities education is carried out, and their specific parameters are determined. New approaches to the constitution of basic models of humanitarianism are justified. The research is based on the philosophical and scientific paradigm approach. Situations of autonomous and additional coexistence of educational paradigms are modelled.
About the Authors
A. V. DenikinRussian Federation
Anatoly V. Denikin - Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Professor, Department of Humanities
Moscow
Z. Z. Denikina
Russian Federation
Zoya D. Denikina - Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Professor, Department of Humanities
Moscow
References
1. Akhmedova M. G., Sokolova I. V., Chankova E. V. Communicative competence of the personality as a sociohistorical phenomenon: system analysis. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015;6(5S 3):347–355.
2. Bondarenko N. G., Lukyanov G. I., Makhamatov T. M., Egorova L. I., Avdeeva T. I., Belyanova E. N. Education and information technology: blended learning and inquiry-based learning innovative solutions. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems. 2020;12(S 1):386–393.
3. Denikin A. V., Denikina Z. D. Educational trust as a phenomenon of communicative rationality. Mir obrazovanija — obrazovanie v mire. 2019;(2):31–36. (In Russ.).
4. Ioseliani A. D. Global digital society and social adaptation to online everyday life. Vek globalizatsii. 2020;(2):62–71. (In Russ.).
5. Orekhovskaya N. A., Galushkin A. A., Maleko E. V., Bezenkova T. A., Plugina N. A. Globalization and youth: a philosophical analysis of challenges and ways to o vercome them. XLinguae. 2018;11(2):256–264.
6. Osipov G. V., Ponkratov V. V., Ivlev V. Ju., Ivleva M. I., Karepova S. G. Factors in managing publication productivity in Russian universities. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews. 2020;8(5):102–120.
7. Stepin V. S. Theoretical knowledge: structure, historical evolution. Moscow: Progress-Tradition; 2003. (In Russ.).
8. Gadamer H.-G. Truth and method: fundamentals of philosophical hermeneutics. Moscow: Progress; 1988. (In Russ.).
9. Habermas Yu. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Translated from German. D. V. Sklyadnev, ed. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 2001. (In Russ.).
10. Lektorsky V. A. Epistemology classical and non-classical. 4th ed., stereotype. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.).
11. Moiseev N. N. Modern rationalism. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.).
12. Budanov V. G. Methodology of synergetics in post-non-classical science and education. Moscow: Book House “LIBROCOM”; 2009. (In Russ.).
13. Popov A. A. Open education: philosophy and technology. Moscow: Book House “LIBROCOM”; 2012. (In Russ.).
14. Luhman N. Society of society. I. Society as a social system. Moscow: Logos: 2004. (In Russ.).
15. Shchedrovitskij G. P. Sign and activity. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. The structure of the sign meaning: 14 lectures. 1971. G. A. Davydova, editor. Moscow: East Literature; 2005. (In Russ.).
16. Naisbit J. High technology, deep humanity. Moscow: AST, Transi Book; 2005. (In Russ.).
17. Fromm E. The man for himself. Moscow: ST; 2008. (In Russ.).
18. Fukuyama F. The end of History and the last man. Moscow: AST, Ermak Publishing House: 2007. (In Russ.).
19. Sagatovskij V. N. Value bases of humanitarian e xpertise. Novosibirsk; 1992. (In Russ.).
20. Bakhtin M. M. Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow; 1979. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Denikin A.V., Denikina Z.Z. Prospects of Humanitarian Education: From Subject to System Rationality. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2021;11(4):102-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-4-102-110