Ethnic Enclaves of Instability in the South of Russia
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-2-70-73
Abstract
The subject of this article is the analysis of the current state of interethnic relations in the Southern and North Caucasus Federal districts. A preliminary analysis revealed some unresolved conflicts with historical, political, economic and, in part, civilizational foundations. The implementation of the state national policy and the process of integration of ethnocultural diversity of the peoples of Russia within the framework of the Russian nation contributed to the reduction of conflict tension in these regions. However, due to the powerful influence, including foreign actors, some territories can in the future become not only hotbeds of tension, but also an open confrontation of the peoples inhabiting them. The state policy in the South of the Russian Federation takes into account aspects of the complex multicultural and multi-confessional mosaic of the region. First of all, it is aimed at countering the trends of extremism and radicalism. This study is devoted to the identification of the most problematic regions in the South of Russia.
Supporting agencies: Russian Science Foundation (project No. 17-68-00001 “The impact of institutional instability of neighbouring countries on the activities of extremist organisations in the South of Russia”); FGBUN Center for security studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
About the Author
A. V. Bredikhin
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (History), Advisor to the Director of the Center for Security Research.
Moscow
References
1. National policy and modernisation of the management system in the South of Russia: history and modern challenges. Matishov G. G., ed. Rostov-on-Don; 2012. 478 p. (In Russ.).
2. Cherkasova T. P., Lozovova L. A., Shubina L. V. Regional projections of the state policy of formation of national identity in the South of Russia (on the example of the Rostov region). Materials of the scientific and practical conference. Rostov-on-Don; 2018:400-410. (In Russ.).
3. Volkov Yu.G., Denisova G. S., Lubskij A. V. Development of ethnic cultures as an instrument of national policy in the South of Russia: based on the sociological survey. Sodal’no-gumanitarnyeznaniya. 2016;12-2:9-18. (In Russ.).
4. Bedrik A. V., Serikov A. V. Human flows, ethnic diasporas, and regional security in Southern Russia. Social’no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2017;(7):84-90. (In Russ.).
5. Adiev A. Z. National movements of Nogais in the South of Russia. Nauchnaya mysl’Kavkaza. 2015;2(82):99-106. (In Russ.).
6. Bedrik A. V. Specifics of adaptation of Meskhetian Turks in the socio-cultural environment of the South of Russia. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Severo-Kavkazskij region. Seriya: Obshchestvennye nauki. 2009;(5):88-92. (In Russ.).
7. Guzenkova T. S., Nemensky O. B., Khizrieva G. A. The Crimean Tatars: the peculiarities and problems of integration. Problemy natsional’noi strategii. 2016;4(37):31-57. (In Russ.).
8. Bredikhin A. V. The Crimean Tatar issue in the foreign policy of the Ukrainian authorities. Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii. 2017;4(37):37-47. (In Russ.).
9. Bredikhin A. V. Multinational map of the Don: conflicts in the “Eastern territories”. Ethnosocium i mezhnacional’naya kul’tura. 2015;10(88):95-98. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Bredikhin A.V. Ethnic Enclaves of Instability in the South of Russia. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019;9(2):70-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-2-70-73
Views:
479
Email this article 