Sanctions as a Tool for the Coercion of States: Ideological Aspect
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-6-49-57
Abstract
The implementation of sanctions as an instrument of policy implementation is deeply rooted in the history of international relations. The sanctions restrictions themselves may concern not only the economic but also the political, diplomatic and other spheres of activity. The goal of sanctions has always been the same - to influence the target country without the use of complex military actions, weakening it and pushing for political capitulation. Economic sanctions are today one of the most effective forms of pressure. It is because, in the context of the creation of a single global market, economic relations have become important, respectively, their gap leads to significant costs. This article is devoted to the analysis of sanctions instruments used by international actors to exert pressure on sovereign States. The purpose of sanctions is to influence the target country without the use of complex military actions, weakening it and pushing for political capitulation. The authors note that the United States, which is the main driving force of the sanctions policy, uses it to solve its geo-economic and geopolitical problems. At the same time, the West, which seeks to preserve the existing liberal world order, and, in particular, the United States, losing the status of a global hegemon, uses the principles of neo-modernism as a new philosophical basis for its ideology.
About the Authors
D. A. EgorchenkovRussian Federation
Dmitrii А. Egorchenkov - Director of the Institute for strategic studies and predictions at RUDN University.
Moscow.
N. S. Danyuk
Russian Federation
Nikita S. Danyuk - Deputy Director of the Institute for strategic studies and predictions at RUDN University.
Moscow.
References
1. Gompert, David C. and Hans Binnendijk. The Power to Coerce: Countering Adversaries Without Going to War. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2016. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1000.html.
2. Baluev D. G. Evolution of economic sanctions as an instrument of foreign policy. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2014;3(38):25. (In Russ.).
3. Kazantsev S. V. Anti-Russian sanctions: a monologue from a position of strength. Ekonomicheskaya politika. 2015;(1):13-30. (In Russ.).
4. Glebova N. C. On the situation around the Arab boycott. Institut Blizhnego Vostoka RAN. URL: http://www.nmes.ru/?p=3913. (In Russ.).
5. Ponomareva E. G. Never forget! The NATO aggression against Yugoslavia. Obozrevatel’. 2014;(6):83-100. (In Russ.).
6. Koshkin R. P. Russia and prospects of global governance: geopolitical aspects of the problem. Strategicheskie prioritety. 2017;4(16):52-77. (In Russ.).
7. Yurtaev V. I. Iran in the situation of transformation of the sanctions regime. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2017;10(2):66-80. (In Russ.).
8. Bazhanov E. Russia and the West. URL: https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/985 (In Russ.).
9. Filimonov G. Yu. The U. S. foreign policy: technologies of parallel reality formation. Geopoliticheskii zhurnal. 2014;(7):2-10 (In Russ.).
10. Astakhov E. M. Russia’s tasks in the information war. Ezhegodnik Instituta mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii (universiteta) Ministerstva inostrannykh del Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2014;(4):136-141. (In Russ.).
11. Aron R. The opium of the Intellectuals. Munchen: TsOPE; 1960. 240 p. (In Russ.).
12. Bzhezinskii Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya; 1998. (In Russ.).
13. Bernays E. L. Propaganda. Moscow: Hippo Publishing LTD; 2010. (In Russ.).
14. Smirnov I. K., Popov M. V. Dialectics of capitalism and socialism. St. Petersburg: Fond Rabochei Akademii; 2015. (In Russ.).
15. Stalin I. Marxism and the national question. Collected works, vol. 2. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury; 1946. (In Russ.).
16. Kortunov A. From Postmodernism to Neo-modernism, or Memories of the future. URL: http://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/ot-postmodernizma-k-neomodernizmu-ili-vospominaniya-o-budushch. (In Russ.).
17. Barkovskii A. N., Alabyan S. S., Morozenkova O. V. Consequences of the Western sanctions and retaliatory sanctions of the Russian Federation. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik. 2015;(9):3-7. (In Russ.).
18. Nureev R. M., Petrakov P. K. Costs and benefits of sanctions exchange. In Institutional transformation of the Economy: Space and Time. Sbornik dokladov V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii: v 2-kh tomakh. Kemerovo: Izdatel’stvo Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta; 2017. (In Russ.).
19. Zaitseva E. V. Sanction for sanction: bans imposed by Russia and the West, the impact on the further development of the Russian Federation. Molodoi uchenyi. 2016;(2):493-497. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Egorchenkov D.A., Danyuk N.S. Sanctions as a Tool for the Coercion of States: Ideological Aspect. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2018;8(6):49-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-6-49-57