Preview

Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University

Advanced search

THE IMPACT OF THE CONFLICT SITUATION IN DONBASS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SOUTH OF RUSSIA

https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-4-82-89

Abstract

The state crisis on the territory of Ukraine contributed to the sovereignty of the Donetsk and Luhansk people’s republics and the formation of armed confrontation in the Donbas. The destabilization of the situation in the region has led to a political, economic and ideological crisis, which, in view of the existing interrelationships, has partly spread to the border regions of the Russian Federation. For a long period, the system of Euro-regional cooperation aimed at the development of economic and socio-cultural relations has been created in the Russian-Ukrainian cross-border area. Despite their “freezing”, the current Ukrainian authorities consider Russian territories, such as the Rostov region, the Krasnodar territory, the Republic of Crimea, the city of Sevastopol as “disputed territories” and make appropriate political claims. They are also working on the organization of subversive actions, an intelligence network and support of extremist organizations in these territories. The author applies institutional and comparative methods aimed at examining the problem of the study, and concludes on the need to strengthen the processes of integration of the unrecognized republics of Donbass into the Eurasian economic space, control of the “demarcation line” and the activities of marginal and extremist organizations in the territory of border regions of the Russian Federation, capable of acting as representatives of the interests of the Ukrainian authorities.

About the Author

A. V. Bredikhin
Center for security studies of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Бредихин А. В. Национальные и религиозные проблемы в Донецкой и Луганской народных республиках. Россия и новые государства Евразии. 2017;(2):69-82

2. Бредихин А. В. Тенденции к федерализации Украины на примере Донецкой и Луганской областей. Шевченкiвська весна, матерiали Мiжнародної мiждисциплинарної науково-практичної конференцiї студентiв, аспiрантiв та молодих вчених. К.: Логос, 2012. Вип. Х. Ч. 2. С. 477-479

3. Бредихин А. В. История российско-украинского сотрудничества (на примере еврорегиона «Донбасс»). Автореферат дисс. … канд. ист. наук. М.; 2016. 23 с

4. Бредихин А. В. Казачий Дон: между Украиной и Россией. М.: ИИУ МГОУ; 2017. 124 с

5. Дергачев В. Крымский сценарий повторить невозможно. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2015/05/14_a_6686821.shtml

6. Павленко Д. Киевские нацисты предъявляют России территориальные претензии. URL: https://tsargrad.tv/articles/kuban-rostovshhina-brjanshhina-i-drugie-iskonno-ukrainskie-zemli_61276 (дата обращения: 23.09.2017)

7. Романов П. Учить историю и не дразнить казаков: глава Кубани ответил украинскому министру. URL: https://riafan.ru/758733-uchit-istoriyu-i-ne-draznit-kazakov-glava-kubani-otvetil-ukrainskomu-ministru

8. Логинов В. Крым всегда был пророссийским, и все об этом знали. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2017/07/06_a_10775786.shtml

9. Степанов А. Украинские диверсанты: «СБУ послала нас шпионить в Россию под видом фотографов». URL: https://www.rostov.kp.ru/daily/26215/3099512/

10. Бредихин А. В. О территориальных претензиях в российско-украинском приграничье. Альманах «Казачество». 2016;(16):17-32

11. Горяев О. 12 лет строгого режима получил украинский пенсионер-диверсант. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3372918

12. Bredikhin A. V. National and religious problems in Donetsk and Luhansk people’s republics. Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii. 2017;(2):69-82. (In Russ.)

13. Bredikhin A. V. Trends to federalization of Ukraine on the example of Donetsk and Luhansk regions. In: Shevchenko spring. Materials of the International scientific-practical conference of students, postgraduates and young scientists. Kiev: Logos; 2012. Vol. Х, Part 2:477-479. (In Russ.)

14. Bredikhin A. V. The history of Russian-Ukrainian cooperation (on the example of the Euroregion “Donbass”) (Master’s abstract of a master’s thesis). Moscow; 2016. 23 p. (In Russ.)

15. Bredikhin A. V. Cossack Don: Between Ukraine and Russia. Moscow: IIU MGOU; 2017. 124 p. (In Russ.)

16. Dergachev V. It is impossible to repeat the Crimean scenario. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2015/05/14_a_6686821.shtml. (In Russ.)

17. Pavlenko D. Kiev Nazis make Russia territorial claims. URL: https://tsargrad.tv/articles/kuban-rostovshhina-brjanshhina-i-drugie-iskonno-ukrainskie-zemli_61276 (аccessed 23.09.2017). (In Russ.)

18. Romanov P. To learn history and not to tease Cossacks: The head of Kuban answered the Ukrainian Minister. URL: https://riafan.ru/758733-uchit-istoriyu-i-ne-draznit-kazakov-glava-kubani-otvetil-ukrainskomu-ministru. (In Russ.)

19. Loginov V. Crimea has always been Pro-Russian, and everyone knew about it. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2017/07/06_a_10775786.shtml. (In Russ.)

20. Stepanov A. Ukrainian saboteurs: “SBU sent us to spy in Russia under the guise of photographers”. URL: https://www.rostov.kp.ru/daily/26215/3099512. (In Russ.)

21. Bredikhin A. V. About territorial claims in the Russian-Ukrainian frontier. Al’manakh “Kazachestvo”. 2016;(16):17-32. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Bredikhin A.V. THE IMPACT OF THE CONFLICT SITUATION IN DONBASS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SOUTH OF RUSSIA. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2018;8(4):82-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-4-82-89

Views: 346


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-7867 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1482 (Online)