A MAN AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL INTEGRITY: METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-4-44-49
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to analyse anthropological integrity as a subject of philosophical anthropology and to develop a new methodological approach. The methodology of human research as anthropological integrity proposed by the author is a unity and complementarity of three components: categorical modelling, system approach, and hermeneutic procedures. Categorical modelling through fundamental anthropological constants creates a problem field of the study of man. The systematic approach concretizes anthropological integrity through the identification of the main forms of human existence. The hermeneutic procedures create opportunities for understanding the initially undifferentiated holistic experience, manifesting itself in its ontological difference. Considering fundamental anthropological constants in connection with the system approach and hermeneutics as a methodological basis for the study of anthropological integrity is coherent with the problems of human self-determination in contemporary circumstances.
About the Author
L. E. Motorina
Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Махаматов Т. М., Махаматова С. Т. Проблемы методологии социально-гуманитарного познания. Гуманитарные науки. Вестник финансового университета. 2017;3(27):32-39
2. Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время. М.: Академический проект; 2013
3. Хайдеггер М. Время и бытие. М.: Республика; 1993
4. Бибихин В. В. Узнай себя. СПб.: Наука; 1998
5. Зеньковский В. В. Проблемы воспитания в свете христианской антропологии. М.: Издание Свято-Владимирского Братства; 1993
6. Барулин В. С. Социально-философская антропология. М.: Онега; 1994
7. Шатилов А. Б. Формирование концепта государственного патриотизма в России в период 2000-2017 гг.: основные этапы и базовые идеологемы. Гуманитарные науки. Вестник финансового университета. 2017;3(27):18-23
8. Фрейд З. Недовольство в культуре. Философские науки. 1989;(1):100
9. Makhamatov T. M., Makhamatova S. T. The problems of the methodology of socio-humanitarian cognition. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta. 2017;3(27):32-39
10. Heidegger M. Being and time. Moscow: Academic project; 2013. (In Russ.)
11. Heidegger M. Existence and Time. Moscow: Republic; 1993. (In Russ.)
12. Bibihin V. V. Recognize yourself. St. Petersburg: Science; 1998. (In Russ.)
13. Zenkovsky V. V. The problems of education in the light of Christian anthropology. Moscow: Publication of St. Vladimir Brotherhood; 1993. (In Russ.)
14. Barulin V. S. Socio-philosophical anthropology. Moscow: Onega; 1994. (In Russ.)
15. Shatilov A. B. Formation of the concept of state patriotism in Russia in the period 2000-2017: The main stages and basic ideologems. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta. 2017;3(27):18-23. (In Russ.)
16. Freud Z. Discontent with culture. Filosofskie nauki. 1989;(1):100. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Motorina L.E. A MAN AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL INTEGRITY: METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2018;8(4):44-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-4-44-49
Views:
432
Email this article 