Preview

Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University

Advanced search

TRANSFORMATION OF POLITICAL ELITES OF THE CRIMEAN PENINSULA IN THE CONTEXT OF REUNIFICATION WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-3-90-93

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the Crimean political elite in the context of the entry of the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol as a subject of the Russian Federation. I considered the main elite groups operating on the Peninsula since the 1990s of the 20th century, their relationship with the Ukrainian authorities, as well as the transformation and renewal of the ruling groups in connection with the reintegration of the Republic of Crimea. It is noted that there is no obvious split among the ruling elite on the Peninsula, no groups are created according to political views. However, there is a marked difference in the origin of the members of the regional elite. The author comes to the conclusion that there is a complex of objective and subjective difficulties of staff transformation of the Crimean elites. In particular, I considered the problem of relations between the Crimean political elite and the Federal government and the struggle for key positions in the region. The main conflict of interaction is the weak orientation of the new elite in the specifics of the Peninsula’s life, the mentality of the inhabitants and its history. At the same time, there is an acute shortage of highly qualified personnel. As a result, the Peninsula is experiencing, to some extent, a shortage of personnel what provokes the federal authorities to attract managers from the mainland.

About the Author

A. M. Khokhlova
Financial University
Russian Federation


References

1. Хохлова А. М., Пивоварова М. А. Инклюзивное развитие региона. Инновационная экономика: перспективы развития и совершенствования. 2015

2. Шатилов А. Б. «Крымский консенсус» российской элиты: причины и последствия. Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. 2015;4(20)

3. Голуб Н. Н., Кудлай А. А. Рейтинг влиятельности представителей Государственного совета Республики Крым: эффективность и результативность работы. Вестник МЮИ. 2015;7(54)

4. Кабышев В. Т. Возвращение Крыма в Россию: конституционно-правовой дискурс. Вестник Саратовской государственной юридической академии. 2015;4(16)

5. Костяев С. С., Юшков И. В. Особенности интеграции и адаптации Крыма в российскую социально-политическую систему. Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. 2015;4(20)

6. Khokhlova A. M., Pivovarova M. A. Inclusive development of the region. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya. 2015

7. Shatilov A. B. “The Crimean consensus” of the Russian elite: Causes and consequences. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2015;4(20)

8. Golub N. N., Kudlai A. A. Rating of the influence of representatives of the State Council of the Republic of Crimea: Efficiency and effectiveness. Vestnik MYuI. 2015;7(54)

9. Kabyshev V. T. Return of the Crimea to Russia: Constitutional and legal discourse. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii. Vypusk. 2015;4(16)

10. Kostyaev S. S., Yushkov I. V. Peculiar properties of integration and adaptation of the Crimea in the Russian social and political system. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2015;4(20)


Review

For citations:


Khokhlova A.M. TRANSFORMATION OF POLITICAL ELITES OF THE CRIMEAN PENINSULA IN THE CONTEXT OF REUNIFICATION WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2018;8(3):90-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-3-90-93

Views: 287


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-7867 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1482 (Online)