ЭМПИРИЧЕСКОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ СОСТОЯНИЯ И ПОТЕНЦИАЛА РАЗВИТИЯ КИТАЙСКО-РОССИЙСКОЙ ДВУСТОРОННЕЙ ТОРГОВЛИ
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-3-59-69
Аннотация
Об авторах
Да. ЯнгРоссия
П. Цуй
Россия
Список литературы
1. Source: Big Data Report of Trade Cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative 2017
2. Product codes SITC 0-SITC 9 separately represent food and live animals, beverages and tobacco, inedible raw materials other than fuel, mineral fuels, lubricants and related raw materials, animal and vegetable oils, fats and waxes, no-listed chemicals and related products, manufactures mainly classified by materials, machinery and transport equipment, miscellaneous manufactured articles and other uncategorized goods and transactions
3. Index of Trade Intensity (TCD) is an index used to measure the trade intensity of a trade partner. Its value is equal to the ratio of a country’s exports to certain trading partner of the country’s total exports divided by the rate of the partner’ exports accounted for the proportion of total world imports
4. Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) is an index comparing a proportion of a specific kind of export goods in a country’s total exportations and the proportion of this kind of goods in the global total exportations
5. The data of culture differences comes from Hofstede(2001), At first, we should remove the excluded countries and then we select four dimensions of PDI,IDV,MAS and UAI in Hofstede (2001) due to some countries missing IND and LTO indictors. On this basis, we construct culture difference index variables combining the method of Kogut and Singh (1988)
6. Generally speaking, if VIF>10, there exists severe multiple collinear; if 5 < VIF № 10, there exists a degree of multiple collinear conditions; if VIF<5, there is no multiple collinear. The VIF values in results of the model test are all under 5, which indicates there exists no multi-collinearity problem. In other words, if you do not include the above explanatory variables, there could be a variable-missing problem
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Янг Д., Цуй П. ЭМПИРИЧЕСКОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ СОСТОЯНИЯ И ПОТЕНЦИАЛА РАЗВИТИЯ КИТАЙСКО-РОССИЙСКОЙ ДВУСТОРОННЕЙ ТОРГОВЛИ. Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. 2018;8(3):59-69. https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-3-59-69
For citation:
Yang D., Cui P. AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON STATUS AND POTENTIAL OF SINO-RUSSIAN BILATERAL TRADE. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2018;8(3):59-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-3-59-69