SOCIO-POLITICAL MOVEMENTS: CONTRADICTIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CONCEPT
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-3-44-49
Abstract
The article attempts to present the analysis of the socio-political movement (SPM) as a category of political science in the form of an extremely general concept that expresses its most significant properties and relations in the context of global changes in the modern world order. The main question discussed in this paper is not whether the theories applied to the analysis of the SPM are positivist ones, or, on the contrary, they are simplified versions of the interpretation of the essence of the phenomenon, but whether they are relevant and complete enough to cover the most important current and future areas of focus and influence from the socio-political movement, whose role and importance tend to accelerated growth. According to the results of the study, we proposed an experimental model for the analysis of theoretical considerations in the interpretation of the concept of SPM, which includes two approaches to the theory of cognition of the concept. The first is the narrowing and concentration of focus on the single and main attribute of the concept (the term “movement”) and its content. The second is based on the use of knowledge about others elements, also included in the essence and content of the concept - “social” and “political”. The experimental model of the analysis in the theory of concept serves only as an additional tool of theoretical research to the existing models. But it also does not fully reflect the essence, content of the SPM, nor its role and significance, leaving an array of problems and contradictions for future theoretical and practical research.
About the Author
N. N. Sokolov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Слизовский Д. Е., Рузанов С. А., Олейников Д. И. Общественно-политическое движение в России (1991-1999 гг.): актуальность, подходы исследования. Региональное и муниципальное управление: вопросы политики, экономики и права. 2016;3-4(4-5):34-43
2. Karl-Dieter Opp. Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements. New York: Routledge; 2009
3. Пикетти Т. Капитал в XXI веке. URL: http://capitalism.filosoff.org/tvorchestvo/kapital-v-xxi-veke-tomas-piketti/pagen/4/ (дата обращения: 10.01.2018)
4. Шарп Д. От диктатуры к демократии. Антипутч. Пер. с англ. Макаровой Н. Екатеринбург: Ультра; Культура; 2005
5. Шатилов А. Б. Элита, лидер, народ в современных развитых государствах: опыт рационального анализа власти. Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. 2016;3(23):54-59
6. Шульц Э. Э. Теория социальных движений: проблемы теории и практики. Вестник Северного (Арктического) федерального университета. Серия: Гуманитарные и социальные науки. Н-Новгород; 2014
7. Береснев Д. Н., Жалнин В. А., Слизовский Д. Е. Политика Российской Федерации по повышению экспортного потенциала системы образования: риски и возможности старта. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология. 2017;(4):366-378
8. Ленин В. И. Философские тетради. Адоратский В. В., Сорин В. Г., ред. М.; 1933
9. Gallie W. B. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1955-1956. P. 169
10. Silfen D. Glasberg, Shannon D. Political sociology: oppression, resistance, and the state. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Pine Forge Press, 2011. URL: https://www.worldcat.org/title/political-sociology-oppression-resistance-and-the-state/oclc/746832550 (дата обращения: 12.12.2017)
11. Armstrong E. A., Bernstein M. Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements. URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00319.x; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.464.2206&rep=rep1&type=pdf (дата обращения: 10.12.2017)
12. Slizovskij D. E., Ruzanov S. A., Olejnikov D. I. Socio-political movement in Russia (1991-1999.): Relevance, research approaches. Regional’noe i municipal’noe upravlenie: voprosy politiki, ekonomiki i prava. 2016;3-4(4-5):34-43. (In Russ.)
13. Karl-Dieter Opp. Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements. New York: Routledge; 2009
14. Piketty T. Capital in the XXI century. URL: http://capitalism.filosoff.org/tvorchestvo/kapital-v-xxi-veke-tomas-piketti/pagen/4/ (аccessed 10.12.2017). (In Russ.)
15. Sharp G. From dictatorship to democracy. Ekaterinburg: Ultra. Culture; 2005. (In Russ.)
16. Shatilov A. B. Elite, leader, people in modern developed countries: the experience of rational analysis of power. Gumanitarnye nauki.Vestnik finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2016;6(3):54-59. (In Russ.)
17. Schulz E. E. Theory of social movements: problems of theory and practice. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) Federal’nogo Universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i social’nye nauki. 2014:23-29. (In Russ.)
18. Beresnev D. N., Zhalnin V. A., Slizovsky D. E. Policy of the Russian Federation on increase of the export capacity of the education sector: risks and opportunities start. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Politologiya. 2017;19(4):366-378. (In Russ.)
19. Lenin V. I. Philosophical notebooks. Adoratsky V., Sorin V. G., eds. Moscow; 1933. 165 p. (In Russ.)
20. Gallie W. B. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1955-1956. 169 p
21. Glasberg D. Silfen, Shannon D. Political sociology: Oppression, resistance, and the state. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press; 2011. URL: https://www.worldcat.org/title/political-sociology-oppression-resistance-and-the-state/oclc/746832550 (аccessed 12.12.2017)
22. Armstrong E. A., Bernstein M. Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements. Sociological Theory. 2008;26(1):74-99. URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00319.x
23. * Федеральный закон от 19.05.1995 № 82-ФЗ «Об общественных объединениях» (ред. от 02.06.2016)
Review
For citations:
Sokolov N.N. SOCIO-POLITICAL MOVEMENTS: CONTRADICTIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CONCEPT. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2018;8(3):44-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-3-44-49
Views:
514
Email this article 