Preview

Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University

Advanced search

Historical Memory as a Subject of Philosophical Analysis

https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2026-16-2-6-16

Abstract

The article compares the essential, contextual and systemic concepts of historical memory. In the first, historical memory is thought of in the interval of truth-value and inclusion in the structure of national identity. In the second case, the value content of historical memory depends on the gradation of conditions, which leads to a pluralism of interpretations. In this case, from the standpoint of epistemological holism, historical memory is interpreted as a kind of collective knowledge, and from the point of view of ontological holism it is expressed in intersubjective reality, the relationship of the Self and the Other. The article concludes that a systematic projection of the study of historical memory is currently promising. An autopoietic variant of system analysis is proposed, in which historical memory acts as one of the ways of self-observation of the statesystem and reflection of the external environment. Historical memory is defined as the ability of a state system to maintain and reproduce holistic meanings under any environmental conditions. The abstractions of the collective subject and the systemic subject differ. A collective entity may remain such without being a systemic entity, for example, when a State loses sovereignty. The logic of the collective subject’s activity can be value-neutral and instrumentalist. While the subject system acts as a carrier of the historical common and maintains internal integrity. Thus, the combination of subjective and systemic ontology in the understanding of historical memory removes the opposition of epistemological and ontological holism.

About the Authors

Z. D. Denikina
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Zoya D. Denikina — Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Prof. of the Department of Humanities, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications

Moscow



A. V. Denikin
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Anatoly V. Denikin — Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Prof. of the Department of Humanities, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications

Moscow



N. A. Orekhovskaya
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Natalia A. Orekhovskaya — Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Prof. of the Department of Humanities, Head of the Department of Humanities, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications

Moscow



References

1. Orekhovskaya N.A. Formation of mass consciousness of the Soviet people during the Great Patriotic War. In: One victory for all. Spiritual, Socio-economic, and Military-political Aspects of the Great Patriotic War. Moscow: Prometheus; 2025:111-129. (In Russ.).

2. Shevchenko O.V. The image of the hero as a socio-cultural phenomenon. In: A Historical and Philosophical View on the Appearance of the Hero-warrior. Moscow: Rusains; 2024:56-65. (In Russ.).

3. Volobuev A.V. Historical memory as a construct. In: One victory for all. Spiritual, Socio-economic, and Militarypolitical Aspects of the Great Patriotic War. Moscow: Prometheus; 2025:769-782. (In Russ.).

4. Bondareva Ya.V., Ilyinskaya S.G. Logic of the meaning of Russian civilization through the prism of Russian philosophy. Modern philosophical research. 2024;2:64–75. (In Russ.). URL: https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2024-2-64-75

5. National identity and collective memory: between the past and the future [collective monograph]. Simferopol; 2022. 320 p. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/dnxgco (In Russ.).

6. Kryuchkova S.E. Soviet identity as a factor of victory in the Great Patriotic War. In: One victory for all. Spiritual, Socioeconomic, and Military-political Aspects of the Great Patriotic War. Moscow: Prometheus; 2025:753-768. (In Russ.).

7. Polezhaev D.V. Preservation of historical memory as a mechanism for the formation of all-Russian civic identity: “The Stalingrad experience”. In: One victory for all. Spiritual, Socio-economic, and Military-political Aspects of the Great Patriotic War. Moscow: Prometheus; 2025:733-752. (In Russ.).

8. Petrash E.V. Sociocultural aspects of interpretation of historical events in teaching the history of the Great Patriotic War. In: One victory for all. Spiritual, Socio-economic, and Military-political Aspects of the Great Patriotic War. Moscow: Prometheus; 2025:899-911. (In Russ.).

9. Bochkarev A.I., Kanabeeva R.A. Genesis of hybrid existence of modern economics of education. Moscow: KnoRus; 2020. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/ugczae (In Russ.).

10. Denikin A.V. Denikina Z.D. Philosophical and methodological analysis of the falsification of the history of the Great Patriotic War. In: One victory for all. Spiritual, Socio-economic, and Military-political Aspects of the Great Patriotic War. Moscow: Prometheus; 2025:83-793. (In Russ.).

11. Zamaraeva E.I. Falsification of the history of the Great Patriotic War as a weapon in cognitive wars. In: One victory for all. Spiritual, Socio-economic, and Military-political Aspects of the Great Patriotic War. Moscow: Prometheus; 2025:837-849. (In Russ.).

12. Doronina S.G. The social structure of the past: individual and collective memory. Tempus et Memoria. 2020;1(1–2):36– 43. (In Russ.). URL: https://doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2020.1-2.004

13. Makarova N.P., Glebova S.V. Culture of memory in the digital age: “hero of the epoch”, archive and canon. Discourses of Ethics. 2024;2(22):35-54. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/dmkchx (In Russ.).

14. Gorelov A.A. Some fundamental directions of the Russian project of civilizational development and the civilizational foundations of Russia. Knowledge. Understanding. Ability. 2024;3:82-92. (In Russ.). URL: https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2024.3.6

15. Riker P. Memory, history, oblivion. Translated from French. Moscow: Publishing House of Humanitarian Literature; 2004. (In Russ.).

16. Trufanova E.O. Individual and collective memory: Points of intersection. Questions of philosophy. 2020;6:18–22. (In Russ.). URL: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-6-18-22

17. Fedorova M.M. Memorial phenomenon and the crisis of historical consciousness of modernity. Questions of philosophy. 2020;6:38–42. (In Russ.). URL: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-6-38-42

18. Chestnov I.L. Postclassical theory of law. The monograph. St. Petersburg: Alef-Press Publishing House; 2012. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/qssdiv (In Russ.).

19. Stepin V.S. Historical types of scientific rationality: Problems of demarcation and continuity. Philosophy, methodology and history of science. 2015;1:6-27. (In Russ.). URL: https://doi.org/10.17720/2413-3809.2015.t1.1.s01

20. Lektorskiy V.A. Constructive realism as a modern form of epistemological realism. Philosophy of science and technology. 2018;23(2):18–22. (In Russ.). URL: https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2018-23-2-18-22

21. Spiridonova V.I. “State-civilization” as a new formula of existence in the 21st century. Social sciences and modernity. 2022;3:116-127. (In Russ.). URL: https://doi.org/10.31857/S086904992203008X

22. Kaftan V.V. Dialectics of social chaos and order. In: A historical and Philosophical View on the Appearance of the Hero-warrior. Moscow: Rusains; 2024:326-342. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/qjvkrg (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Denikina Z.D., Denikin A.V., Orekhovskaya N.A. Historical Memory as a Subject of Philosophical Analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2026;16(2):6-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2026-16-2-6-16

Views: 151

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-7867 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1482 (Online)