National Policy in the Administration of Scientific Resources in Higher Education System: Institutional Aspect

The article considers the actual problem of participation of political institutes in the course of forming, implementation and an assessment of public policy on management of the scientific capacity of the higher school of Russia. At the beginning of article the author emphasizes value of this direction of policy (in particular, the higher school carries out double function: implementation of scientific researches and preparation of scientific personnel) also assumes that research of this perspective should be begun with the analysis of its institutional aspects. As methodological and methodical base of research the author of article uses a complex of general scientific methods (the analysis, synthesis, a method of analogies, a comparative and legal method, etc.), and also actively relies on results of sociological and expert polls. The special attention is paid to the deep analysis of programs of political parties which is carried out by the author regarding their relation to problems of development of research activities of higher education institutions. Within article also foreign experience of any participation of “boundary structures” in processes of forming and implementation of a state policy in the field of development of high school science is given. As the main results of research the author allocates: first, the main social and political institutes participating in the considered processes; secondly, confirms subjectivity and independence of the specified institutes; thirdly, reveals the major factors influencing institutional structure of public policy on management of the scientific capacity of the higher school of modern Russia. Among the last are noted: 1) factors of political and cultural nature; 2) current policy of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation and her perception high school community; 3) the actual concentration of attention of the state, political parties and other political institutes on adjacent problems of the state scientific and technical policy; 4) traditional secondariness of higher education institutions as subjects of research activities; 5) lobbist activities in the sphere of science. As the perspective directions of researches in the field it is obviously important to consider in details a role of each social and political institute at various stages of lifecycle of a state policy on management of the scientific capacity of the higher school. The received results can form the basis of the new concept of the corresponding direction of public policy.

public policy, political institute, state, political party, boundary structure, group of interests, lobby, scientific capacity of high school

1. Государственная политика: механизмы и технологии формирования. Сборник материалов круглого стола, проведенного в Государственной Думе ФС РФ [Текст] / под ред. В.В. Бурматова, С.А. Мелькова, А.П. Кошкина, К.А. Картушевой. - М.: Белый ветер, 2014.

2. Знаменский Д.Ю. Участие политических институтов в процессе формирования государственной научно-технической политики Российской Федерации [Текст] / Д.Ю. Знаменский, О.А. Михалина // Вестник университета (Государственный университет управления). - 2013. - № 8. - С. 191-195.

3. Знаменский Д.Ю. Политические институты в процессе формирования государственной научно-технической политики в современной России [Текст]: монография / Д.Ю. Знаменский. - М.: ГУУ, 2015.

4. Лопарев А.В. Институционализация гражданского общества в современной России [Текст] / А.В. Лопарев // Вестник университета (Государственный университет управления). - 2014. - № 16. - С. 48-53.

5. Перегудов С.П. Политическая система России в мировом контексте: институты и механизмы взаимодействия [Текст] / С.П. Перегудов. - М.: РОССПЭН. 2011. - С. 344.

6. Сунгуров А.Ю. Как возникают политические инновации: «фабрики мысли» и другие институты-медиаторы [Текст] / А.Ю. Сунгуров. - М.: Политическая энциклопедия, 2015.

7. Туровский А.А. Характер взаимодействия бизнес-структур с органами государственной власти [Текст] / А.А. Туровский, А.Д. Асеев // Вестник университета (Государственный университет управления). - 2015. - № 6. - С. 10-14.

8. Brooks S. Public policy in Canada. An Introduction. Toronto: Oxford University Press. 1998. Р. IX.

9. Педагогический словарь [Текст] / Г.М. Коджаспирова, А.Ю. Коджаспиров. - М.: Академия. 2005.

10. Русский орфографический словарь [Текст] / Российская академия наук. Ин-т рус. яз. им. В.В. Виноградова; отв. ред. В.В. Лопатин, Б.З. Букчина, Н.А. Еськова и др. - М.: Азбуковник. 1999.

11. http://минобрнауки.рф/media/events/files/41d5ba4833829314cd7c.pdf (дата обращения: 02.04.2016).

12. http://er.ru/party/program/ (дата обращения: 04.08.2016).

13. http://spravedlivo.ru/5_76349.html (дата обращения: 05.08.2016).

14. http://ldpr.ru/party/Program_LDPR/ (дата обращения: 05.06.2016).

15. https://parnasparty.ru/party/platform (дата обращения: 05.06.2016).

16. http://pravoedelo.ru/party/program/ (дата обращения: 26.05.2016).