Models of the Relationship Between Corporate and Individual Identity
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-4-57-64
Abstract
The article discusses options for the relationship between corporate and individual images in the minds of an employee. The very understanding of “image” is clarified and its components are highlighted. The main problem, as seen by the authors of this article, is that often an employee has contradictions between his own vision of his image and the image of the organization (or team) in which he works. This gives rise to difficulties associated with the loss of professional identity, the risks of professional destruction, as well as erroneous personnel decisions if the employee’s image is not based on business success, but on a false assessment of his real qualifications and dubious personal characteristics. A generalized model of the relationship between individual and corporate image is proposed, based on taking into account the acceptance or rejection by a specific employee of his image and the image of his organization, which allows us to distinguish four main statuses: the status of “alien” for an employee of the organization; harmonious status; the status of the employee’s external and internal identity conflict; status when the employee himself perceives himself as an “alien” in the organization. For each of these statuses, generalized recommendations are offered: options for management decisions for managers dealing with employees who are “disoriented” in their images; options for career actions for employees seeking to either maintain their “harmonious” statuses, or trying to resolve their contradictions between their individual and corporate image.
Keywords
About the Authors
N. S. PryazhnikovRussian Federation
Nikolay S. Prjazhnikov — Dr. Sci. (Pedagogical), Prof., Prof. of the Department of Psychology and Human Capital Development,
Moscow.
E. V. Kamneva
Russian Federation
Elena V. Kamneva — Cand. Sci. (Psychological), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof., Department of Psychology and Human Capital Development,
Moscow.
References
1. Osman Z., Samad R. R., Alwi N. H., & Khan B. N.A. Direct and indirect relationship of employee engagement, corporate image, employee loyalty, and business performance among private business organizations. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management and Sciences. 2022;11(3):483–498. DOI: 10.6007/IJAREMS/v11-i3/14976
2. Adeel A., Asim M. Impact of socialization on employee’s reputation. International Journal of Human Resource Studies. 2019;9(2):225–238. DOI: 10.5296/ijhrs.v9i2.14619
3. Guseva T. G., Sadofiev A. A. Image and charisma as the most important tools of a leader. Bulletin of ASU. Series: Economics. 2019;4(250):161–167. URL: https://elibrary.ru/fppfwj (In Russ.).
4. Younis R. A.A., Hammad R. Employer image, corporate image and organizational attractiveness: The moderating role of social identity consciousness. Personnel Review. 2021;1(50);244–263. DOI: 10.1108/PR-02–2019–0058
5. Belobragin V. V. Problems of “Imagology in service” in the context of socio-psychological science. Scientific notes of the Russian State Social University. 2021;2(159):45–53. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17922/2071-5323-2021-20-2-45-53
6. Provotorova O. A. Modern methods of forming the image of an organization (study group) as an element of a marketing strategy. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(S 1):110–113. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-c-110-113
7. Bain K., Hicks N. Building social capital and reaching out to excluded groups: The challenge of partnerships. CELAM meeting on The Struggle Against Poverty Towards the Turn of the Millennium, Washington D. C. 1997:241–258.
8. Nix J., Pickett J. T., Baek H., et al. Police research, officer surveys, and response rates. Policing and Society. 2019;29(5):530–550. DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2017.1394300
9. Pochebut L. G., Chiker V. A., Zakharova M. S. Trust and reputation as components of the cognitive social capital of an organization. Social and economic psychology. 2018;4(12):150–177. URL: https://elibrary.ru/yorchb (In Russ.).
10. Alexandrova Yu.Y., Mironova E. V., Kamneva E. V., Pryazhnikov N. S., Pryazhnikova E. Y. Development prospects and risks of professional identity deformation in the context of the “digitalization” of the labor process. Organizational psychology. 2023;4(30):213–235. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/2312-5942-2023-13-4-213-235
11. Alexandrova Yu.Y., Karlovskaya N. N., Nebrodovskaya-Mazur E. Yu., Pryazhnikov N. S. Moral and psychological foundations for the typology of business reputation in the context of professional identity development. The world of psychology. 2023;4(115):175–187. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.51944/20738528_2023_4_175
12. Fombrun C., Van Riel C. B.M. Fame and Fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Financial Times Prentice Hall books; 2004. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540007
13. Rawls J. The theory of justice. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Novosibirsk University; 1995. 536 p. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01003344755?ysclid=me2svp79xj466510867 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Pryazhnikov N.S., Kamneva E.V. Models of the Relationship Between Corporate and Individual Identity. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2025;15(4):57-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-4-57-64