The Post-Western Order and Eurasian Multilayering: Regional Organizations as Instruments of Russian Foreign Policy

This article explores Russia’s institutional strategy in the Eurasian space through the lens of four key regional organizations: the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Collective Security Treaty Organization, and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Against the backdrop of global systemic transformation, the weakening of Westerncentered governance models, and the shift toward multipolarity, Russia seeks to consolidate its interests via institutional mechanisms that support an alternative architecture of regional coordination. The study offers a comprehensive political analysis of the structure, function, and internal dynamics of these organizations as interrelated instruments of Russian foreign policy. It demonstrates that Moscow has developed a multi-tiered model combining formal mechanisms (CSTO, EAEU) and flexible frameworks (SCO, CIS), tailored to different levels and directions of cooperation. Special attention is given to the comparative roles of Russia, China, and India, as well as to internal contradictions, ranging from legal asymmetries to symbolic practices of leadership. The article’s originality lies in interpreting these regional organizations not as isolated entities but as interconnected components of a coherent strategy aimed at shaping a post-Western international order. It examines instruments of currency and labor integration, responses to sanctions, security coordination, and regional power balancing. The analysis concludes that Russia is constructing not a centralized bloc, but a regime-based network unified by a normative framework rooted in sovereignty, non-interference, and strategic autonomy. These structures function as platforms for projecting influence, legitimizing alternative governance norms, and managing contradictions in a fragmented and turbulent global context. The article provides insight into how institutional layering and cross-regional mechanisms underpin Russia’s ambition to serve as a civilizational core in the evolving multipolar world.

1. Alimov R. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: Its role and place in the development of Eurasia. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018;9(2):114–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.euras.2018.08.001

2. Yenikeyeff Sh., Lukin A., Novikov D. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation in new geopolitical realities. International Organisations Research Journal. 2024;19(1):129–148. DOI: 10.17323/1996–7845–2024–01–06

3. Aris S. Russian-Chinese Relations through the Lens of the SCO. Russie Nei Visions. 2008;(34). URL: https://www.ifri.org/en/papers/russian-chinese-relations-through-lens-sco

4. Perskaya V. V., Khairov B. G., Revenko N. S., et al. Role of the People’s Republic of China in the Activities of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. East Asia. 2022;39:149–160. DOI: 10.1007/s12140–021–09373-y

5. Ünaldılar Kocamaz S. The Rise of New Powers in World Politics: Russia, China and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Uluslararasi Iliskiler. 2019;16(61):127–141. DOI: 10.33458/uidergisi.541542

6. Yilmaz S. Eurasian integration and its challenges. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research. 2017;4(2). DOI: 10.15549/jeecar.v4i2.166

7. Vu Dinh Khoa, Agarwal S., Rincon Aponte G. J., Nguyen THN, Solanki V. K., Ziemba E, eds. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation. ACSIS. 2021;28:91–98. DOI: 10.15439/2021KM53

8. Adarov A., Ghodsi M. The impact of the Eurasian Economic Union–Iran preferential trade agreement on mutual trade at aggregate and sectoral levels. Eurasian Economic Review. 2021;11(1):125–157. DOI: 10.1007/s40822–020–00161–2

9. Jović-Lazić A, Lađevac I. The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and its Relations with Serbia. International Organizations. 2022;2:38–55. DOI: 10.18485/IIPE_IOSCW.2022.2.CH2

10. Hakhverdyan D., Tadevosyan R., Pakhlyan A., Ratner S. The Impact of Eurasian Economic Union Membership on Mutual Trade in Services: What are the Challenges for Small Economies? Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2025;18(3):143. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm18030143

11. Burnasov A., Ilyushkina M., Kovalev Y., Stepanov A. V. Logistics infrastructure of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in providing transit from China to the European Union. Studies of the Industrial Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society. 2020;34. DOI: 10.24917/20801653.344.9

12. Kovalev V. S. The EAEU and China: Partnership in the interests of self-sufficiency. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2023;17(3):15–24. (In. Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/2073–2929–2023–03–15–24

13. Libman A. Chapter 16: EAEU and economic sanctions. In: The Elgar Companion to the Eurasian Economic Union. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2024. DOI: 10.4337/9781800375000.00027

14. Ishukov A. A., Bedrina E. B. European and Eurasian integration: Similarities and differences. Bulletin of the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Ser.: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2020;(4):80–95. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/inirri (In. Russ.).

15. Mozaffari Falarti M, Naqvi FH. Eurasia’s Economic Shift: The rise of de-dollarization and the quest for financial autonomy. Journal of Iran and Central Eurasia Studies. 2024;7(1):95–110. DOI: 10.22059/jices.2024.98941

16. Prokopenko A. Can the digital ruble shield Russia from western sanctions? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2024. 30 p. URL: https://carnegie-production-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/static/files/Russias%20Digital%20Ruble.pdf

17. Tsibulina A. Labour Migration in the EAEU: Any Similarities with the EU? SSRN. 2019. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3509288

18. Kropatcheva E. Russia and the Collective Security Treaty Organisation: Multilateral policy or unilateral ambitions? Europe-Asia Studies. 2016;68(9):1526–1552. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2016.1238878

19. Abramova M, Vilisov M. The Post-Soviet transition: Constitutional structuring and political reality (case-study de la CEI). Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana De Derecho Constitucional. 2020;1(42):3–38. DOI: 10.22201/iij.24484881e.2020.42.14335