Technocratic Elements of Reformatting the Ideological Field
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-4-46-51
Abstract
This article explores the specifics of technocracy as a form of government and an ideology. Given the significance of the topic of the intersection between technological advancements and the political process, it is evident that it is essential to examine and analyze the characteristics and potential of technocracy as a political system that lies at the intersection of scientific and technological development and governance. Technocracy is examined from three perspectives: its classical understanding, its modern interpretation, and as an independent ideological movement known as Technocratism. The author concludes that the communicative aspects of technocracy align with the interests of a modern, sovereign state. However, at the same time, the concept of technocracy is burdened by a significant number of ideological discrepancies that prevent its implementation without infringing on the rights and liberties of the populace.
About the Author
I. S. Pyatibratov
Financial University;
Center for Political Information
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan S. Pyatibratov — Cand. Sci. (Pol.), Senior Lecturer at the Department of Political Science, Financial University; Leading Analyst, Center for Political Information
Moscow
References
1. Yongmou L. American technocracy and Chinese response: Theories and practices of Chinese expert politics in the period of the Nanjing Government (1927–1949). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tehnokratiya-v-ssha-i-kitae-teoriya-i-praktika-kitayskoy-ekspertnoy-politiki-v-epohu-nankinskogopravitelstva1927–1949-gody (In Russ.)
2. Tverdynin N. M. Technocratism and technophobia: rivalry throughout the history of civilization. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tehnokratizm-i-tehnofobiya-sopernichestvo-na-protyazhenii-vseyistorii-tsivilizatsii (In Russ.).
3. Mironov A.V. Technocratism — a vector of globalization development. M.: Maks Press; 2009. 132 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kulyutkin Y. N. Technocracy and humanism. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tehnokratiya-igumanizm (In Russ.)
5. Li. Y., Undurraga E., Zubizarreta J. Effectiveness of Localized Lockdowns in the COVID19 Pandemic. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwac008
6. Goforth C. Trudeau speech reignites conspiracy theory fervor over “Great Reset”. URL: https://www.dailydot.com/debug/great-reset-conspiracy-theory/
7. Bogomazova N. L. The Digital World of the 21st Century: Philosophical and cultural analysis of E. Zamyatin’s dystopian novel “We”. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mir-tsifry-xxi-vekafilosofsko-kulturologicheskiy-analiz-romana-antiutopii-evgeniya-zamyatina-my (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Pyatibratov I.S. Technocratic Elements of Reformatting the Ideological Field. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2024;14(4):46-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-4-46-51
Views:
160
Email this article 