Socio-Psychological Technologies for Personal Security in the BANI-World
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-1-103-110
Abstract
The paper’s goal is to update socio-psychological technologies for personal security in the Brittle Anxious Nonlinear Incomprehensible (BANI) world. To accomplish this, the following tasks need to be completed: determining the essence of the BANI world, proving the feasibility of socio-psychological security, clarifying the content of socio-psychological technologies, and determining their role in ensuring personal security in the BANI world. The authors used results of scientific research and modern press, researched methods of analysis and content analysis of interdisciplinary publications on this issue; methods of systematization, extrapolation, design and modeling, theoretical generalization. Theories and concepts of social interaction that inherently include a person serve as the basis for the content and classification of socio-psychological technologies for personal security in the BANI world. The study analyzes the socio-psychological technologies of three groups from the perspective of representing security at three levels (cognitive, affective, and conative). The authors consider the possibilities of information and communication technologies as a promising direction for providing socio-psychological assistance.
About the Authors
E. Yu. PryazhnikovaRussian Federation
Elena Yu. Pryazhnikova — Dr. Sci. (Psych.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Psychology and Human Capital Development.
Moscow
A. V. Kandaurova
Russian Federation
Anna V. Kandaurova — Dr. Sci. (Ped.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and Methods of Education and Socialization.
St. Petersburg
References
1. Exacousto T. V. The problem of ensuring the socio-psychological safety of the individual. Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal = Russian psychological journal. 2008;5(3):35–43. (In Russ.).
2. Kefeli I. F., Yusupova R. M., eds. Information-psychological and cognitive security. Collective monograph. St. Petersburg: ID “Petropolis”; 2017. 300 p. (In Russ.).
3. Ezhevskaya T. I. Personal security: a system of concepts. Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel’nyh organah = Psychopedagogy in law enforcement agencies. 2008;4(35):47–49. (In Russ.).
4. Aleksandrova A., Soghomonyan T. Philosophical aspects of life safety. URL: http://oldconf.neasmo.org.ua/node/1323 (In Russ.).
5. Maslodudova N. V. The problem of human security in the new social reality. Nauchnyj komponent = Scientific component. 2020;4(8):136–142. (In Russ.).
6. Pride V., Medvedev D. A. The NBIC convergence phenomenon: Reality and expectations. Filosofskie nauki = Philosophical Sciences. 2008;(1):97–117. (In Russ.).
7. Kostenko E. P. Transformation of the role and functions of HR in the context of new economic challenges. Journal of Economic Regulation. 2021;12(4):94–109. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17835/2078–5429.2021.12.4.094–109
8. Toffler E. Future shock. Per. from Eng. Moscow: ACT; 2002. 557 p. (In Russ.).
9. Salikhova N. R. The feasibility of personal values in a situation of life crisis. Psihologicheskij zhurnal = Psychological Journal. 2009;30(1):77–86. (In Russ.).
10. Baeva I. A. Psychology of safety: history, formation, prospects. Национальный психологический журнал = National Journal of Psychology. 2007;1(2):65–69. (In Russ.).
11. Baeva I. A. Technologies for ensuring psychological safety in social interaction as components of the professional competence of a graduate of a psychological and pedagogical profile. Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Herzen University. 2012;(1):93–106. (In Russ.).
12. Edmondson E. Teamwork: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy. Moscow: Eksmo; 2016. (In Russ.).
13. Krasnyanskaya T. M. Personal security of a person in the problem field of security psychology. Vestnik Stavropol’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Stavropol State University. 2005;(40):145–153. (In Russ.).
14. Sukhov A. N. Personal security as a scientific and practical problem. Chelovecheskij kapital = Human capital. 2021;2(146):142–143. (In Russ.).
15. Sukhov A. N. Social psychology of safety. 2nd ed. Moscow: Academia; 2005. (In Russ.).
16. Sukhov A. N. Social and psychological characteristics of personal security. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2022;(2):317–323. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2073–0454–2022–2–317–323
17. Gergen K. J. Social construction in context. Per. from Eng. Kharkov: Gumanitarnyj Centr; 2016. 328 p. (In Russ.).
18. Andreeva G. M. Image of the world and/or real world? Voprosy psihologii = Questions of psychology. 2013;(3):33–43. (In Russ.).
19. Rubinshtein S. L. Theoretical issues of psychology and the problem of personality. URL: https://dbs-lin.ruhruni-bochum.de/personalitaet/pdf/251.pdf (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Pryazhnikova E.Yu., Kandaurova A.V. Socio-Psychological Technologies for Personal Security in the BANI-World. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2024;14(1):103-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-1-103-110