The Future of the Refugees and Forced Migrants Arriving in the Russian Federation because of the Special Military Operation

The paper analyzes the collective perspectives on the future of refugees and displaced persons who arrived in Russia. The researchers conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with them during their stay, both in temporary centers for internally displaced people (IDP) and elsewhere. The study’s results showed that the move to the Russian Federation was voluntary: refugees and internally displaced people considered all alternative options and chose Russia, where they could satisfy their basic need for security. Difficulties with paperwork and bureaucracy have become common problems of adaptation for all. Another burdensome circumstance was the low level of respondents’ legal literacy. The key actors who provided support and assistance to refugees and forced migrants were the state and nonprofit organizations (NPO’s), from which the respondents continue expecting comprehensive support, starting with psychological assistance and simplification of bureaucratic procedures and ending with housing benefits. The authors found that refugees and forced migrants consider the future as one of the most pressing issues and a subject that requires urgent discussion. They also identified a quick planning horizon, which is determined by the achievement of immediate goals, such as successful employment. Therefore, it is unnecessary to discuss medium-term or long-term planning. Furthermore, their adaptation process, the external context, and the course of their work significantly influenced the planning horizon of the studied group.

1. Ivanov V. A., Kryukova K. I. The legal content of the concepts of “refugee” and “internally displaced person”. Mariyskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik = Mari Legal Bulletin. 2016; 3(18):40–42. (In Russ.).

2. Nestik T. A. Collective image of the future: socio-psychological analysis. Psychological studies of problems of modern Russian society. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN; 2013. (In Russ.).

3. Prins G. Generating Two Modes of Life: A Biopolitical Reading of Asylum Seekers and Refugees. Erasmus Student Journal of Philosophy. 2022;(2):17–27.

4. Vigil Y. N., Baillie A. C. “We” the refugees: Reflections on refugee labels and identities. Refuge. 2018;34(2):52–60.

5. Dylgerova N. Y. Research of socio-cultural adaptation of labor migrants from Ukraine to Buryatia. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya Severo-Zapada Rossii = Bulletin of Science and Education of the North-West of Russia. 2015;1(4):231–235. (In Russ.).

6. Barsukova S. Y. Issues of refugees and internally displaced persons in the mirror of ideologies. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya = Policy. Political studies. 1999;(5)31–42. (In Russ.).

7. Stegny V. N., Antipyev K.A. Issues of adaptation of refugees from Ukraine in Russia. Vlast = Power. 2015;(6):138–145. (In Russ.).

8. Gritsenko V.V., Smotrova T. N. Compliance of pre-migration expectations with real living conditions as a factor of successful adaptation of compatriots from Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Socio-psychological adaptation of migrants in the modern world. Penza: Penzenskij gosudarstvennyj universitet; 2016. (In Russ.).

9. Gritsenko V. V. Emotional state of Russian forced migrants. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal = Psychological Journal. 2000;21(4):22–31. (In Russ.).

10. Kaboli S. A. Images of the future of young refugees. Migration-Muuttoliike. 2018;44(1):16–17.

11. Gritsenko V. V. Russians among Russians: problems of adaptation of forced migrants and refugees from neighboring countries in Russia. Moscow: Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science of the Order of Friendship of Peoples Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology named after NN Miklukho-Maklaya of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 1999. (In Russ.).

12. Brough M. et al. Young refugees talk about well-being: A qualitative analysis of refugee youth mental health from three states. Australian Journal of Social Issues. 2003;38(2):193–208.

13. Sagbakken M., Bregård I. M., Varvin S. The past, the present, and the future: a qualitative study exploring how refugees’ experience of time influences their mental health and well-being. Frontiers in Sociology. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00046/full

14. Allan G. A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. URL: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1168/1131

15. Zabaev I. V. Logic of data analysis in grounded theory: B. Glezer’s version. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya. metody. matematicheskoye modelirovaniye = Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling. 2011;(32):124–142. (In Russ.).

16. Strause A., Corbin D. Fundamentals of qualitative research: grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Editorial URSS; 2001. (In Russ.).