Сomparative Analysis of Political Technologies for Optimizing the Intraregional Space of the State
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-5-88-94
Abstract
This article examines foreign experience in managing regional development processes. The author has carried out a comparative analysis of the political mechanisms for optimizing the intraregional policy of the state, the essence of which is the use of various approaches and principles of regional governance. At the same time, the article pays great attention to the problem of differentiation of the regional space. The author analyzes the political technologies which are applied by the governments of different countries and focused on the formation and optimization of the intraregional space. The experience of Poland is considered from the standpoint of the implementation of regional governance during the period of administrative reform there; the experience of Austria and Belgium, which is studied in the aspect of institutional provision of regional policy. The French mechanisms of public administration are studied, with the help of which it was possible to achieve sustainable regional development of the country. Basing of the generalization of foreign experience, the main political technologies for optimizing the intraregional space are provided in then article, in particular: decentralization, regionalization, multi-level regional policy.
About the Author
A. A. Niklaus
Moscow Psychological and Social University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna A. Niklaus — Cand. Sci. (Political Sciences), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Humanities and Natural Sciences
Moscow
References
1. Cornett A. A new regional balance: Regional specialization and growth: An analysis of spatial divergence in Northern Europe. 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “World Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places”, 25–28 August 2015. Lisbon, Portugal, European Regional Science Association (ERSA). Lisbon: Louvain-la-Neuve; 2015.
2. Goschin Z. Regional specialization and geographic concentration of industries in Romania. URL: http://www.asecu.gr/files/RomaniaProceedings/27.pdf 3. Nekhorosheva L. N. Conceptual approaches, methods and tools of cluster policy in the Republic of Belarus and Poland: comparative analysis. Belorusskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal = Belarusian Economic Journal. 2015;(4):4–22. (In Russ.).
3. Zemtsov S. Potential High-Tech Clusters in Russian Regions: From Current Policy to New Growth Areas. Foresight and STI Governance. 2016;10(3):34–52.
4. Grishina I. V. Russia’s spatial development strategy: methodological approaches to the development of an economic block. Moscow: VAVT; 2018. (In Russ.).
5. Kotov A. V. Smart specialization of the region — a solution option for Russia: scientific essay. Moscow: VAVT; 2019. 60 p.
6. Zuev V. N. Supranational mechanisms of integration. Monograph. Moscow: Magistr; 2014. (In Russ.).
7. Boschma R., Coenen L., Frenken K. and Truffer B. Towards a Theory of Regional Diversification: Combining Insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies. Regional Studies. 2017;51(1):31– 45.
8. Kourov R. F. Subsidies of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation and the economic content of their functions. Uchenye zametki TOGU = Scientific notes of TOGU. 2015;6(3):12–17. (In Russ.).
9. Bachtler J., Mendez C. and Wishlade F. EU Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Dynamics of EU Budget and Regional Policy Reform. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2013.
Review
For citations:
Niklaus A.A. Сomparative Analysis of Political Technologies for Optimizing the Intraregional Space of the State. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(5):88-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-5-88-94
Views:
216
Email this article 