General Design of Political Communications Landscape in Modern Russia
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-5-27-32
Abstract
The article presents the author’s view on the issue of organizing the political communications landscape in modern Russia (PC), which is present in our country at the current stage of its development. An original method of classifying the political communications on a subjective basis is proposed, the actors of each type of communication are analyzed in detail, their main goals are listed. The concept of “nativity” of political communication is formulated in the article as one of its key qualitative characteristics. The author provides the “subjective matrix of political communications”. It expresses the author’s approach to their classification in modern Russia. For each class or type, the main goals are defined, the conflict-free achievement of which is an indicator of their success.
About the Authors
J. F. Aliyev
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Jomart F. Aliyev — Cand. Sci. (Economics), First Vice-Rector
Moscow
V. E. Sarkisov
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vartan E. Sarkisov — Postgraduate Student of the Department of Political Science and Applied Political Work
Moscow
References
1. Meadow R. G. Politics as communication. Norwood: Ablex publ. co.; 1980. 269 p.
2. Тимофеева Л. Н. Политическая коммуникативистика: мировая и российская проекции. Политическая наука. 2016;(2):74–100. Timofeeva L. N. Political communication studies: world and Russian projections. Politicheskaya nauka = Political Science. 2016;(2):74–100. (In Russ.).
3. Винер Н. Человек управляющий. СПб.: Питер; 2001. 288 с. Wiener N. Managing Man. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2001. 288 p. (In Russ.).
4. Easton D. A framework for political analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979. 142 p.
5. Deutsch K. The nerves of government: models of political communication and control. New York: The Free Press; 1963. 316 p.
6. Almond G., Coleman J. The politics of the development areas. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1960. 591 p.
7. Лассуэлл Г. Д. Техника пропаганды в мировой войне. Пер. с англ. М.: ИНИОН РАН; 2021. 237 с. Lasswell G. D. Propaganda techniques in world war. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: INION RAN; 2021. 237 p. (In Russ.).
8. Braddock R. An extension of the “Lasswell formula”. Journal of Communication. 1958;8(2):88–93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460–2466.1958.tb01138.x
9. Лазарсфельд П., Берельсон Б., Год Х. Выбор народа: как избиратель принимает решение в президентской кампании. Пер. с англ. Ульяновск: УлГУ; 2018. 151 с. Lazarsfeld P., Berelson B., God X. People’s choice: how a voter makes a decision in a presidential campaign. Transl. from Eng. Ulyanovsk: UlGU; 2018. 151 p. (In Russ.).
10. Campbell A., Converse P. E., Miller W. E., Stokes D. E. The american voter. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1976. 573 p.
11. Graber D. A. Mass media and american politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2002. 441 p.
12. Katz E. Communication research and the image of society convergence of two traditions. American Journal of Sociology. 1960;65(5):435–440. DOI: 10.1086/222746
13. Bartels L. M. Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1988. 374 p.
14. Хабермас Ю. Теория коммуникативной деятельности. Том первый. Рациональность действия и социальная рационализация. Пер. с нем. М.: Весь Мир; 2022. 880 с. Habermas Yu. Theory of communicative activity. Volume one. Rationality of action and social rationalization. Transl. from Herman. Moscow: Whole World; 2022. 880 p. (In Russ.).
15. Edelman M. Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988. 137 p.
16. Ginsberg B., Shefter M. Politics by other means: politicians, prosecutors, and the press from Watergate to Whitewater. 3rd ed. New York: Norton; 2002. 266 p.
17. Чудинов А. П. Дискурсивные характеристики политической коммуникации. Политическая лингвистика. 2012;2(40):53–59. Chudinov A. P. Discursive characteristics of political communication. Politicheskaya lingvistika = Political linguistics. 2012;2(40):53–59. (In Russ.).
18. Соловьев А. И. Политическая коммуникация: к проблеме теоретической идентификации. Полис. Политические исследования. 2002;(3):5–18. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2002.03.02 Soloviev A. I. Political communication: to the problem of theoretical identification. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya = Policy. Political studies. 2002;(3):5–18. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2002.03.02 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Aliyev J.F., Sarkisov V.E. General Design of Political Communications Landscape in Modern Russia. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(5):27-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-5-27-32
Views:
257
Email this article 