Preview

Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University

Advanced search

Conceptual and Ideological Factors of the Modern Public Policy Quality

https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-5-17-21

Abstract

The article discusses the issue of ideological and conceptual factors which exert significant influence on the quality of the state policy in modern societies. The ratio of these factors and those taken into account in various quantitative methodologies is currently an integral part of the discussions concerning modern states, political regimes, democratization and modernization. The political evolution of societies is impossible without conceptual and ideological factors. This means that approaches and methods for assessing the quality of public administration will depend on the value definitions which underlying the understanding of the desirability or undesirability of specific management steps. An example of the contradictions that arise in the process of the influence exerted on the effectiveness of public administration by conceptual factors is the debate around ESG, which itself reflects the crisis of the popular concept of “governance.” The growth of social requests based on “trendy” left-liberal interpretations of human rights and civil society, on the one hand, forms the trajectory for the development of public administration in many modern countries, but, on the other hand, the same request can lead to “overwhelming of the state,” which repels an increasing number of non-Western states from this approach.

About the Author

S. P. Mitrakhovich
Financial University
Russian Federation

Stanislav P. Mitrakhovich — Senior lecturer of the Department of Political Science

Moscow



References

1. Klimenko A. V., Larionov A. V., Minchenko O. S. The sphere of public administration and its main characteristics. Moscow: Izdatel’skij dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki; 2021. 44 p. (In Russ.).

2. Dobrolyubova E. I. Assessing the quality of public administration in Russia and other major economies of the world. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba = Public service. 2021;(1):19–27. (In Russ.).

3. Inglehart R. Cultural evolution: how human motivations change and how it changes the world. Transl. from English. Moscow: Thought; 2018. 347 p. (In Russ.).

4. Mikhailova O. V. The concept of “Governance”: political networks in modern public administration. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 21: Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo) = Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 21: Governance (state and society). 2009;(2):40–58. (In Russ.).

5. King A. Overload: Problems of Governing in the 1970s. Political Studies. 1975;(23):284–296.

6. Fukuyama F. Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity: Trans. from English. Moscow: OOO “Izdatel’stvo ACT”: ZAO NPP “Ermak”; 2004. 730 p. (In Russ.).

7. Poluha E., Rosendahl M. Contesting ‘good’ governance: cross-cultural perspectives on representation, accountability and public space. Routledge: Psychology Press; 2002. 276 p.

8. Shatilov A. B. Russian political science: is it time for modernization and nationalization? Vlast’ = Power. 2022;(4):9– 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i4.9116 (In Russ.).

9. Petrosyants D. V., Mitrakhovich S. P. Collaborations in modern science: a course towards autarky? Vlast’ = Power. 2021;(6):38–41. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v29i6.8675

10. Rothschild J. The Logic of a Co-Operative Economy and Democracy 2.0: Recovering the Possibilities for Autonomy, Creativity, Solidarity, and Common Purpose. The Sociological Quarterly. 2016;57(1):7–35.


Review

For citations:


Mitrakhovich S.P. Conceptual and Ideological Factors of the Modern Public Policy Quality. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(5):17-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-5-17-21

Views: 214


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-7867 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1482 (Online)