On the significance of Modern social and behavioral ontologies
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-4-30-39
Abstract
As challenges and uncertainties and risks are forming, the competition of countries for a better future is intensifying, and the number of studies and publications of multimillion global scientific community is growing, the role and importance of adequate description, accessibility and practical use of global knowledge is continuously increasing. Ontologies are becoming a tool for organizing both scientific and practical activities. As the world develops and becomes more complex, the importance and role of human beings grows — accordingly, the significance of ontologies in the social and behavioral sciences and the possibilities of their application for the purposeful creation of a better future grows significantly. Mastering modern digital approaches to creating dynamic ontologies and their application becomes the key to the development of a globally significant unique national project to create a better future for Russia and competitive strategic management of its sustainability.
About the Authors
V. V. Vorozhikhin
Russian Economic University named after G. V. Plekhanov; Institute for the Study of Science of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Vorozhikhin — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher; Leading Researcher
Moscow
Е. I. Larionova
Institute for the Study of Science of Russian Academy of Sciences; Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena I. Larionova — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Scientific Secretary; Professor of the Department of Business Intelligence
Moscow
References
1. Chusov A. V., Frolov I. E. On ontological substructure of dialectical method. URL: https://ecfor.ru/wpcontent/uploads/pub/frol04.pdf (In Russ.).
2. Leshcheva I. A. Method of automated filling knowledge bases of ontological type. Thesis of doctoral research for Technical Sciences. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University; 2022. 215 p. (In Russ.).
3. Lavrishcheva E. M., Karpov L. E., Tomilin A. N. Semantic resources for developing ontology of scientific and engineering subject areas. Scientific Service on the Internet: Proceedings of XVIII All-Russian Scientific Conference (19–24 September 2016, Novorossiysk). Moscow: M. V. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics; 2016. (In Russ.).
4. Borgest N. M. Scientific basis of design ontology. Ontologija proektirovanija = Design Ontology. 2017;1(7):7–25. (In Russ.).
5. Borgest N. M. Frontiers of Design Ontology. Ontologija proektirovanija = Design Ontology. 2017;1(23):7–33. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18287/2223–9537–2017–7–1–7–33
6. Vorozhikhin V. V. On the prospects of integrating cyber-physical systems into the national innovation system (NIS) based on human and artificial intelligence. URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_50748671_71291024.pdf (In Russ.).
7. Vaino A., Kobyakov A., Sarayev V. Market Code. Jekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies. 2011;(11):94–99. (In Russ.).
8. Pasquinelli M., Joler V. The Nooscope Manifested. Artificial Intelligence as Instrument of Knowledge Extractivism. AI & SOCIETY. 2021; (36):1263–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146–020–01097–6
Review
For citations:
Vorozhikhin V.V., Larionova Е.I. On the significance of Modern social and behavioral ontologies. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(4):30-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-4-30-39
Views:
253
Email this article 