Militarisation of post-Soviet Ukraine as a Factor of the Modern International Crisis
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-3-72-78
Abstract
The article studies the militarisation of the foreign and domestic policy of post-Soviet Ukraine as the driving force of the crisis of modern international relations. The article substantiates the formation of the national-state model of Ukrainian militarism in the period 1991–2022. The ideological and political prerequisites of the genesis of Ukrainian militarism and its relationship with extremist ideological doctrines and teachings are analyzed in the article. The stages of militarisation of the Ukrainian state are considered, on the basis of which the conclusion is made about the formation of new challenges to political stability in Eastern Europe in the XXI century. The necessity of conceptual consolidation of ideas about the militarization of Ukraine’s policy in the doctrinal documents of ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation is argued.
About the Authors
D. L. Tsybakov
The Academy of Civil Protection of the EMERCOM of Russia named after Lieutenant General D. I. Mikhailik
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry L. Tsybakov — Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of State and Municipal Administration
Khimki
I. K. Vasilenko
Donetsk National University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor K. Vasilenko — Cand. Sci (Law), Associate Professor
Donetsk
References
1. Melkov S.A. Hermeneutics of modern militarism: reflections of a political scientist. Vlast’ = Power. 2013;(1):191–192. (In Russ.).
2. Lasswell H.Essays on the garrison state: New Brunswick, New Jersey; London: Transaction Publishers; 1997.
3. GoltsA.M.The Burden of Militarism. Otechestvennye zapiski = Domestic notes. 2005;5(26):195–204. (In Russ.).
4. Joana J., Merand F.Varieties of liberal militarism: A typology. French politics. 2014;(12):177–191.
5. Bickford A., Militarism and militarization, anthropology. International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, second edition. Vol. 4. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015.
6. Klyamkin I.M., ed. The Russian state: yesterday, today, tomorrow. Moscow: New Publishing house; 2007. 624 p. (In Russ.).
7. Bacevich A.The New American militarism. How Americans are seduced by war. Oxford — New York; 2005. 270 p.
8. Lantsov S.A.Ukrainian nationalism as a destabilizing factor in the Eurasian space: some aspects of genesis. Evrazijskaya integraciya: ekonomika, pravo, politika = Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics. 2014;(15):124–131. (In Russ.).
9. Mishchenko I.E. Futurology of militarism: foundations and experience of socio-cultural forecasting. Chelovek. Kul’tura. Obrazovanie = A Human. Culture. Education. 2021;2(40):137–140. (In Russ.).
10. Williams A. Liberalism and War: Winners and Losers (New International Relations). New York, London: Taylor and Francis Group, Routledge; 2006. 263 p.
Review
For citations:
Tsybakov D.L., Vasilenko I.K. Militarisation of post-Soviet Ukraine as a Factor of the Modern International Crisis. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2023;13(3):72-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-3-72-78
Views:
506
Email this article 