Progression of students’ creative activity in studying foreign languages in a non-linguistic university
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-6-122-133
Abstract
Nowadays, the problem of developing the creative activity of the younger generation is of particular attention. Modern economic, technological and socio-cultural realities, technical modernization of industries, scientific achievements determine the social need for initiative, creative people, often with a substandard view of the problem, flexible thinking, the desire to transform reality and expanding the boundaries of experience, as well as going beyond it. Mainly, it is being correlated with the state vision of the education results in a non-linguistic university and modern global trends in the modernization of education. The paper provides a theoretical analysis and an assessment of the results of a pedagogical experiment on the approbation of a model for the development of students’ creative activity in the framework of foreign language education. The research describes the author’s model for the progression of students’ creative activity and applies diagnostics of its effectiveness. The authors used almost the same diagnostic tools in order to ensure objectivity and the possibility of comparing the initial and final stages results of the trial.
About the Authors
N. G. Kondrakhina
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalya G. Kondrakhina — Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of English Language and Professional Communication
Moscow
N. E. Yuzhakova
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nina E. Yuzhakova — Senior Lecturer of the Department of English Language and Professional Communication
Moscow
References
1. Zhuchkov V. M. Development of scientific and technical creativity of children: Current state, problems. Modern education: traditions and innovations. 2017;(1):28–31. (In Russ.).
2. Melnik V. I. Methodological bases for the study and development of students’ creativity. Ekaterinburg: Publishing House of RGPPU; 2013. 117 p. (In Russ.).
3. Petrovsky A. V. Theoretical psychology. Moscow: Academy; 2001. 495 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. Psychology of creative abilities. Moscow: Academy; 2002. 320 p. (In Russ.).
5. Krasnovsky E. A. Indicators in education. Standards and monitoring in education. 2002;(5):53–57. (In Russ.).
6. Mordkovich V. G. Social activity: Some methodological problems of fixation and measurement. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Sociological Research; 1986. 137 p. (In Russ.).
7. Robert J. Sternberg. The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 2006;18(1):87–98. (In Russ.).
8. Lubart T. Psychology of creativity. Moscow: Kogito-Centre; 2009. 137 p.
9. Ilyin E. P. Psychology of creativity, creativity, giftedness. St. Petersburg: Peter; 2009. 434 p. (In Russ.).
10. Amonashvili Sh. A. Humane ways to children. M.: Publishing House “Institute of Practical Psychology”; Voronezh: NPO “MODEK” Publishing House; 1998. 544 p. (In Russ.).
11. Bondareva P. G. Creativity as a way of comprehensive development of children. Bulletin of science and creativity. 2020;10(58):16–19. (In Russ.).
12. Ilyin E. P. Psychology for teachers. St. Petersburg: Peter; 2012. 640 p. (In Russ.).
13. Maksimova S. V. Principles of the complementary-semantic approach in the system of creative activity of schoolchildren development based on the portfolio. Pedagogy of Art. 2020;(4):218–225. (In Russ.).
14. Belyaev G. Yu. Pedagogical characteristics of the educational environment in various types of educational institutions. Dis. … Cand. Sci. (Ped.): 13.00.01. Moscow; 2000. (In Russ.).
15. Patrikeeva S. A. The role of amateur creativity in the process of forming the creative activity of schoolchildren. Socio-economic phenomena and processes. 2013;1(47):272–275. (In Russ.).
16. Khutorskoy A. V. Model of the educational environment in distance heuristic learning. URL: http://eidos.ru/journal/2005/0901/htm. (In Russ.).
17. Rubinstein S. L. Fundamentals of General Psychology. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2000. 705 p. (In Russ.).
18. Yakimanskaya I. S. The principle of activity in educational psychology. Questions of psychology. 1989;(6):5–13. (In Russ.).
19. Bodrug N. A. Components, criteria, indicators and levels of pedagogical skills formation of future teachers. URL: https://sci-article.ru/stat.php?i=1409411305. (In Russ.).
20. Gruzdeva M. V. Features of the implementation of continuity in the development of speech creativity in children of preschool and primary school age. Bulletin of the Pushkin Leningrad State University. 2017;(2):182–194. (In Russ.).
21. Mayorova N. V. The problem of the development of creative cognitive activity in the history of pedagogical thought. Bulletin of the Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University. 2013;3(79):76–80. (In Russ.).
22. Karavaev G. A. Inner world and social activity of the individual (from work experience). Is all activity as it? What do we study: activity or playing? Issues of teaching philosophy and social sciences: Scientific collection. Yakutsk: YSU Publishing House; 2001. 115 p. (In Russ.).
23. Yunusova E. A.-G. Theoretical foundations for the development of creative activity of schoolchildren in the educational process. Scientific notes of the Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. 2019;2(16):28–32. (In Russ.).
24. Kozilova L. V. Modern educational environments and problems of professional self-realization of teachers: monograph. Petrozavodsk: ICNP “New Science”; 2020. 160 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kondrakhina N.G., Yuzhakova N.E. Progression of students’ creative activity in studying foreign languages in a non-linguistic university. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(6):122-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-6-122-133
Views:
250
Email this article 