Preview

Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University

Advanced search

Assessing method for meta-professional competencies in Russian educational institutions

https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-6-53-62

Abstract

University graduates may face challenges when solving actual business problems because of their lack of soft skills, which are often inferior to their hard skills. Their knowledge (hard skills) may be at a good level, but they often lack developed universal competencies (soft skills). The paper discusses the methodology for assessing the meta-professional competencies of university students based on the results of the pilot year of the project “Assessment and development of managerial competencies in Russian educational institutions”. The research developed psychometric methods and applied as assessment tools: a universal personality questionnaire, a vitality questionnaire, tests for the analysis of numerical and verbal information. The paper provides descriptions and justifications for the validity and tests reliability used to diagnose universal competencies, as well as the procedure for creating a composite construct. The authors propose a method for creating a composite score to combine the results of assessment using a battery of tests and questionnaires. The resulting composite score makes it possible to consider the links between the evaluated constructs and simplify the interpretation of the evaluation results.

About the Authors

A. G. Komissarov
RANEPA; ANO “Russia — Land of Opportunities”
Russian Federation

Alexey G. Komissarov — Vice-Rector of the Presidential Academy; Director of the Higher School of Public Administration at the RANEPA; General Director

Moscow



E. A. Stepashkina
ANO “Russia — Land of Opportunities”
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Stepashkina — Head of the Department of Analytics and Development of Diagnostic Instruments, Department of Assessment and Methodology

Moscow



O. B. Soboleva
ANO “Russia — Land of Opportunities”
Russian Federation

Olga B. Soboleva — Leading Specialist in Methodology, Department of Analytics and Development of Diagnostic Instruments

Moscow



D. Yu. Guzhelya
ANO “Russia — Land of Opportunities”
Russian Federation

Dmitry Yu. Guzhelya — Cand. Sci. (Ped.), Director of the Department of Evaluation and Methodology

Moscow



P. S. Seleznev
Financial University
Russian Federation

Pavel S. Seleznev — Dr. Sci. (Pol.), Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of International Economic Relations

Moscow



References

1. Stepashkina E. A., Sukhodoev A. K., Guzhelya D. Yu. Study of the profile of cross-professional competencies demanded by leading employers when hiring students and university graduates and young professionals. Modern analytics of education. 2022;2(62):1–32. (In Russ.).

2. Spencer L. M. Jr., Spencer, S. M. Competencies at work. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: HIPPO; 2005. 384 p. (In Russ.).

3. Stack-Cutler H.L., Parrila R. K., Torppa M. Using a multidimensional measure of resilience to explain life satisfaction and academic achievement of adults with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2015;48(6):646–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414522705

4. Osin E. N., Rasskazova E. I. A short version of the hardiness test: Psychometric characteristics and application in an organizational context. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology. 2013;(2):147–165. (In Russ.).

5. Osin E. Factor structure of the short version of the Viability Test. Organizational psychology. 2013;3(3):42–60. (In Russ.).

6. Tupes E. C., Christal R. E. Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of personality. 1992;60(2):225–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.1992.tb00973.x

7. Norman W. T. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1963;(66):574–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040291

8. Goldberg L. R. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological assessment. 1992;(4):26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040–3590.4.1.26

9. Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (Neo-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa: FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992. 101 p.

10. Baturin N. A., Vuchetich E. V., Kostromina S. N., Kukarkin B. A., Kupriyanov E. A., Lurie E. V., Mitina O. V., Naumenko A. S., Orel E. A., Poletaeva Yu.S., Popov A. Yu., Potapkin A. A., Simonenko S. I., Sinitsyna Yu.D., Shmelev A. G. Russian standard for personnel testing. Organizational psychology. 2015;5(2):67–138. (In Russ.).

11. Cronbach L. J., Meehl P. E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological bulletin. 1955;52(4):281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957

12. Brown T. A. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford; 2006. 475 p.


Review

For citations:


Komissarov A.G., Stepashkina E.A., Soboleva O.B., Guzhelya D.Yu., Seleznev P.S. Assessing method for meta-professional competencies in Russian educational institutions. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(6):53-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-6-53-62

Views: 446


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-7867 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1482 (Online)