Network audience of protest agenda in the Republic of Belarus in 2020–2021: digital portrait, motivation, and behavioural models
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-2-97-108
Abstract
The article presents the study of the features of the protest and pro-government network audience involved in the Belarusian protest agenda in 2020–2021. The relevance of this topic is due to the similarity of the economic, social, and cultural space of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation, which gives grounds to assume the interaction of unconventional Russian political actors with similar groups in our country. The research methodology is hybrid in nature and consists of cognitive mapping, automated social media analysis and in-depth interviews. The article presents the results obtained during the implementation of the developed methodology. As a prospect for this study, it should be noted the development of tools and a scheme for forming a sample population for conducting a mass survey to determine the ratio of the identified motivations and patterns of behaviour among supporters of protest and government.
Keywords
About the Authors
N. A. TyukovRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (History), Associate Professor, Department of Political Sciences; Associate Professor, Department of Mass Communications and Media Business
Moscow
E. R. Nikulin
Russian Federation
Master’s student, Faculty of History, Institute of History and Politics
Moscow
V. L. Shapovalov
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (History), Associate Professor, Department of Political Science; Associate Professor, Department of Comparative Political Science
Moscow
References
1. Castells M. The Rise of the network society. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3746/ef34fd58d047d973008a0a723f832a83797e.pdf
2. Berger P., Lukman T. Social construction of reality: a treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Moscow: Medium; 1995. (In Russ.).
3. Reingold G. Smart crowd: a new social revolution. Transl. from English. Moscow: GRAND-FAIR; 2006. (In Russ.).
4. Thompson J.B. Political scandal: power and visibility in the media age. Cambridge: Polity; 2000.
5. Brodovskaya E.V. Mass political protests in the Republic of Belarus in the summer-autumn of 2020: causes, social base, digital infrastructure. Journal of Political Studies. 2021;5(1):23–35. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/2587–6295–2021–5–1–23–35
6. Dombrovskaya A. Yu., Nikulin E.R. Media infrastructure of protest in the “new” media on the example of the Belarusian case (December 2019): structure, channels, meanings, technologies. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mediynaya-infrastruktura-protesta-v-novyh-media-na-primere-belorusskogo-keysa-dekabr-2019-goda-struktura-kanaly-smysly-tehnologii. (In Russ.).
7. Kosorukov A.A., Osipov V.S. Mechanisms of socio-political mobilization of youth on the example of Russian, Belarusian and Chinese telegram channels. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mehanizmy-sotsialnopoliticheskoy-mobilizatsii-molodezhi-na-primere-rossiyskih-belorusskih-i-kitayskih-telegram-kanalov. (In Russ.).
8. Lebon G. Psychology of masses and peoples. Social and human sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Series 11: Sociology. Abstract journal. 1995;(2):166–189. (In Russ.).
9. Ortega y Gasset X. Aesthetics. Philosophy of culture. Moscow: Art; 1991. (In Russ.).
10. Serio P. How texts are read in France. Moscow: Progress; 1999. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Tyukov N.A., Nikulin E.R., Shapovalov V.L. Network audience of protest agenda in the Republic of Belarus in 2020–2021: digital portrait, motivation, and behavioural models. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(2):97-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-2-97-108