Methodological Problems Concerning Concept’s Formation of the National Cybersecurity in the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-1-70-74
Abstract
The development of information technologies and the widespread digitalisation of many life factors needs an individual’s information security in the digital space. Also, it indicates the need to develop a system of control over this space. This article discusses the main problems concerning the Russian national cybersecurity policy concept. The authors note that two multidirectional trends influence the implementation of the security policy and the protection of information resources and data. First, it is the lack of a clear definition of the Internet space and its boundaries in the legislative framework. Second, the significant interest of the public sector in the independence and security of this space from possible threats and attacks. The formation of the concept of national interest in the field of cybersecurity leads to the solution of several tasks at once, both in the internal domain of digital presence and in the international arena. The authors provide several fundamental terms that will be interesting and necessary for further research in this direction. We have drawn attention to the insufficient terminological elaboration of this topic.
About the Authors
G. Yu. Nikiporets-TakigawaRussian Federation
Galina Yu. Nikiporets-Takigawa - Dr. Sci. (Political Sciences), Cand. Sci. (Philological Sciences), Dean of the Faculty of Humanities
Moscow
E. V. Buchnevb
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Buchnev - Assistant and Postgraduate student at the Faculty of Humanities
Moscow
References
1. Stepanov V. I. Creation of cycling infrastructure in Moscow. The Greater Eurasia: Development, security, cooperation = Bol’shaya Evraziya: Razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo. 2020;3(1):938–940. (In Russ.).
2. Ponizovkina I. F. Digitalisation of higher education: prospects and risks. Law and practice = Pravo i praktika. 2020;(1):194–202. (In Russ.).
3. Lukyanets A. N., Elmendeeva M. A. Pedagogical technologies in the era of digitalisation of higher education. The azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology = Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya. 2020;9(4):171–173. (In Russ.).
4. Shandora N. Digitalization of the healthcare system: experience and prospects. Science and innovation = Nauka i innovatsii. 2020;(2):38–43. URL: https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2020-2-38-43. (In Russ.).
5. Hayes R. A. One click, many meanings: interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2016;(60):171–187.
6. Urnov M. Yu. Russia: virtual and real political perspectives. Social sciences and modernity = Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2014;(5):52–62. (In Russ.).
7. Litvinov D. A. Assessment of Russia’s cybersecurity policy and possible options for its improvement. Bulletin of science and education = Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019;19–2(73):76–82. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Nikiporets-Takigawa G.Yu., Buchnevb E.V. Methodological Problems Concerning Concept’s Formation of the National Cybersecurity in the Russian Federation. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022;12(1):70-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-1-70-74