Protest socio-political mood of residents of the Far East in 2020 (on the example of Khabarovsk, Vladivostok, Blagoveshchensk)
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-4-169-175
Abstract
determine the socio-political mood of residents (qualitative methods: focus groups and expert interviews) in each city. Secondly, each of the cities analysed the election results over the past few years to determine the dynamics of support for loyal to power candidates and a batch of power. Thirdly, a cybermetric analysis of the empirical data of the responses of residents of regions on the activities of federal and local authorities in social media using the “Medialogy” monitoring and analytics system was carried out. The result of the study was recommendations for the federal and regional executive bodies to reduce the level of protest sentiment in the regions of the Far East as a whole and regional capitals in particular.
About the Authors
N. M. Pechenkin
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolai M. Pechenkin - Postgraduate student, Department of Political Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications
Moscow
K. I. Netkachev
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kirill I. Nishkachev - Master of Art, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications
Moscow
References
1. Frolov A. A. Features of protests in modern Russia. Collection “VIII All-Russian Congress of Polytologists”. Moscow: Limited Liability Company Publishing House “Aspect Press”; 2018. (In Russ.).
2. Blyher L. E. The need for nationalism, or the Far East in the demographic structure of the APR. Collection of materials of the First Regional Scientific and Practical Conference. Khabarovsk: Book Publishing House; 2004, 272 p. (In Russ.).
3. Konyakhina A. P. Civil participation practices in the Russian Far East. From private interest in public policy: in search of solidarity. Russia and the APR. 2014:4(86):38–55. (In Russ.).
4. Konyakhina A. P. Power as a counterparty: the case of the Russian Far East (1985–2014). Oikumena. Regionovedcheskiye issledovaniya = Regional studies. 2015;4(35):43–54. (In Russ.).
5. Pustovoyt Yu. A. Urban political regimes: coordination of intra elite interaction in large industrial cities. Public administration. Electronic Bulletin. 2014;(46):85–106. (In Russ.).
6. Trachtenberg A. D. Electronic government: technocratic utopia or demanded structure? Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and the Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2011;(11):253–270. (In Russ.).
7. Bykov I. A. Network Political Communication: Theory, Practice and Research Methods: Monograph. St. Pttersburg: FGBOU VPO “SPGUTD”; 2013. (In Russ.).
8. Miroshnichenko I. V. Public policy in modern Russia: the state and trends of development. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye = Human. Community. Control. 2012;(3):4–14. (In Russ.).
9. Volodenkov S. V. Development of modern information and communication technologies as a factor in the formation of the Paradigm of the Network Communication Society. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta = Vestnik Moscow University. 2016;(2):21–34. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Pechenkin N.M., Netkachev K.I. Protest socio-political mood of residents of the Far East in 2020 (on the example of Khabarovsk, Vladivostok, Blagoveshchensk). Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2021;11(4):169-175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-4-169-175
Views:
414
Email this article 