Regulation of the IT Sphere as a Politico-Theoretical and Practical Problem
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-6-67-72
Abstract
The article discusses the development of theoretical and practical ideas about the significance of political regulation of the IT sphere, state control over certain campaigns related to the information industry. Both Western and Chinese experience in regulating the IT sphere is paradoxically similar in attempts to limit the number of players involved in big data, organizations of key digital platforms and the like. In Russia, the global scale of the problem of IT oligarchy also makes it necessary to study it. It is conditioned by almost impossible regulation at the level of a single national state alone. Besides, it is strengthened by the traditional approach of both the authorities and the opposition (including the intellectual front of various ideological connotations) to justify their actions and positions by referring to foreign experience.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared based on the results of studies carried out at the expense of budgetary funds on the state task of the Financial University.
About the Author
S. P. Mitrakhovich
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior Lecturer and Senior Researcher, Department of Political Sciences and Mass Communications
Moscow
References
1. Dahl R.A. Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker. Journal of Public Law. 1957;(6):279–295.
2. Sokolova M. The first successes of the new European general regulation on the protection of personal data. Sovremennaya Yevropa = Modern Europe. 2020;(2):56–66. (In Russ.).
3. Mukhametov D. R. Big data technologies in political processes: opportunities and risks. Gumanitarnyye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019;9(5):143–149. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2226–7867–2019–9–6–143–149.
4. Sinkkonen E., Lassila J. Digital authoritarianism in China and Russia: Common goals and diverging standpoints in the era of great-power rivalry. URL: https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/digital-authoritarianism-in-china-andrussia.
5. Kaminskaya T.L. Responsibility for media content and the problem of censoring the communication space in Russia. Gumanitarnyye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2021;11(2):96–101. URL: https://doi.org/10.26794/2226–7867–2021–11–2–96–101. (In Russ.).
6. Shcherbovich A.A. Comparative analysis of the legislation in sphere of Internet governance in Central and Eastern Europe. Prawo. 2019;(327):325–338. URL: https://doi.org/10.19195/0524–4544.327.21.
7. Eferen Ya. Yu., Rossotto K.M., Khokholov Yu.E. Digital platforms in Russia: competition between national and foreign multilateral platforms stimulates economic growth and innovation. Informatsionnoye obshchestvo = Information society. 2020;(1–2):16–34. (In Russ.).
8. Erokhina O.V. Electronic voting in Russia: technological and political aspects. Gumanitarnyye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2021;11(3):55–61. URL: https://doi.org/10.26794/2226–7867–2021–11–3–55–61. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Mitrakhovich S.P. Regulation of the IT Sphere as a Politico-Theoretical and Practical Problem. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2021;11(6):67-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-6-67-72
Views:
290
Email this article 