Dialectics of Objectivity of the Ontology of Society in Epistemology
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-5-64-71
Abstract
The primary purpose and objective of the study are to identify significant changes in social ontology under the influence of the digitalization process. A critical analysis shows that the categories of society’s ontology have been studied in economic theory, political science, historical sciences, and applied sociology. However, they ignore the philosophical content of the ontological categories of society, which actualizes the study of the dynamics of the ontology of society from the position of metaphysics, i. e., philosophical ontology. The study’s authors used a comparative analysis, theoretical synthesis, the hermeneutic method, and the principles of dialectical logic as the historical concreteness. As a result of the study, starting from the concepts of E. Pickering, L. Duston, P. Galison, M. DeLanda, Ilyenkov, and other authors, significant changes in the concept of objectivity of the ontology of society were revealed.
Keywords
ontology of society,
digitalization,
materiality,
objectivity,
the objectivity of the ideal,
truth,
necessity
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budgetary funds on the state order of the Financial University.
About the Authors
T. M. Makhamatov
Financial University;
Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr Sci. (Philosophy), Professor of the Department of Humanities;
Professor of the Department of Oriental Languages,
Moscow
O. P. Kobzeva
The National University of Uzbekistan named after M. Ulugbek
Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan
Dr Sci. (Historical Sciences), Professor,
Tashkent
T. T. Makhamatov
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Associate Professor at the Department of Humanities,
Moscow
References
1. DeLanda M. A new ontology for the social sciences. Logos, 2017;27(3):35–56. (In Russ.).
2. DeLanda M. A. New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London; Continuum; 2006.
3. Vasyukov V. L. Formal ontology and cognitive research. Cognitive approach. Scientific monograph. Moscow: “Kanon+”, “Reablitaciya”; 2008. (In Russ.).
4. Makhamatov T. M., Makhamatova S. T. Problems of the methodology of social and humanitarian knowledge. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2017;7(3):32–39. (In Russ.).
5. Brassier R. Concepts and objects. Logos. 2017;27(3):227–258. (In Russ.).
6. Duston L., Galison P. Objectivity. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Novaya literature; 2018. (In Russ.).
7. Pickering E. New ontologies. Logos. 2017;27(3):154–174. (In Russ.).
8. Shapiro I. The Flight from reality in the Humanities. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola ehkonomiki; 2011. (In Russ.).
9. Makhamatov T. M., Nakov A. Objective bases of national and ethnic identity, ethnic identity. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2020;10(1):57–62. (In Russ.).
10. Pyrma R.V.Influence of digital communications on political participation. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019;9(4):63–69. (In Russ.).
11. Melvin, James R. (1990). Time and Space in economic analyses. University of Waterloo. Revue Canadienne d’Economique. 1990; XXIII(4):725–747.
12. Popkova E. The Theory of Time in Economy and Perspectives of its Application to Studying Modern Russia’s Economic System. In: System analysis in economics — 2018. Proceedings of the V International research and practice conference-biennale; 2018. (In Russ.).
13. Marx K. Capital. Vol. I. Moscow: Politizdat; 1973. (In Russ.).
14. Halperin P. Ya. Psychology as an objective science. Moscow:-Izdatelstvo moskovskogo psihologosocialnogo instituta; Voronezh: MODEK; 2003. (In Russ.).
15. Leontiev A.N. Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat; 1977. (In Russ.).
16. Ilyenkov E.V. Philosophy and culture. Moscow: Politizdat; 1991. (In Russ.).
17. Standing G. Precariat: a new dangerous class. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2014. (In Russ.).
18. Florida R. Creative class: people who change the future. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: “Klassika-XXI”; 2011. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Makhamatov T.M., Kobzeva O.P., Makhamatov T.T. Dialectics of Objectivity of the Ontology of Society in Epistemology. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2021;11(5):64-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-5-64-71
Views:
325
Email this article 