Preview

Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University

Advanced search

Europeanization and Modernization of the Discourse of Civil society and Political Parties

https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-6-18-23

Abstract

The article examines the evolution at the present stage of theoretical and normative ideas about the role of civil society and political parties in their relationship with the state and their influence on social processes and the economy. Most concepts, offering theoretical reflexion on this issue, appeared in the West, and due to Western influence was borrowed by Russia and other countries, where the discourse of civil society and political parties itself was Europeanized. However, the formal adherence to European intellectual fashion in the most ambitious BRICS countries has now led to the formation of its own analytical and regulatory views on the subject, only externally resembling Western primary sources. At the same time, the use of rethought European views in modernising the own discourse of civil society and political parties allows to give this discourse a respectable image and to be effectively used by the state both for domestic political purposes and in conceptual foreign policy disputes with Europe itself.

About the Author

S. P. Mitrakhovich
Financial University
Russian Federation

Stanislav P. Mitrakhovich — Senior Lecturer, Department of Political Science and Mass Communication

Moscow



References

1. Serpentini Alexia. Inappropriate, Irrelevant, Important: Richard Florida’s ‘Gay Index’ and the Quest for Creativity. King’s College London. January 2013. URL: https://www.academia.edu/11416729/Inappropriate_Irrelevant_Important_Richard_Florida_s_Gay_Index_and_the_Quest_for_Creativity

2. Florida R. The Geography of Tolerance. URL: https://www.citylab.com/equity/2012/07/geographytolerance/2241/.

3. Medvedev S. Protocols of the wise men of Sodom: Why is tolerance important for innovation. 22.10.2013. URL: https://www.forbes.ru/mneniya-column/tsennosti/246435-protokoly-sodomskikh-mudretsov-pochemutolerantnost-vazhna-dlya-inno. (In Russ.).

4. Mitrakhovich S. P. Relations between Russia and EU integration party structures in CPRF discourse. Vlast. 2019;5:37–42. (In Russ.).

5. Kim, Sungmoon. Beyond liberal civil society: Confucian familism and relational strangership. Philosophy East and West. 2010;60(4):476–498.

6. Seligman Adam B. The Idea of Civil Society. N.Y.: Free Press; 1992. 420 p.

7. Davies Jonathan S., Holm-Hansen Jørn, Kononenko Vadim, Røiseland Asbjørn. Network governance in Russia: an analytical framework. East European Politics. 2016;32:2:131–147.


Review

For citations:


Mitrakhovich S.P. Europeanization and Modernization of the Discourse of Civil society and Political Parties. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019;9(6):18-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-6-18-23

Views: 407


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-7867 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1482 (Online)