Smart Cities as a New Quality of Life Standard
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-4-120-125
Abstract
Over the past ten years, the creation of smart cities has become a priority in the development of the digital economy over the world. It is reflected not only in official documents of the leading international organisations including the United Nations (UN), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Commission but also in scientific research of many foreign scientists. There are several approaches to the definition of the term “smart city”. This article will overcome some theoretical gaps in a holistic research approach to the study of smart cities, especially in terms of the impact of information and telecommunication technologies on improving the quality of life and well-being of urban residents, because creating a comfortable living environment is one of the most essential tasks in the concept of a smart city. The author paid particular attention to the analysis of the literature on the problems of smart cities based on the international databases of scientific citing — Web of Science and Scopus; a resulting publication stream made it possible to assess the effectiveness of research in subject areas related to economics. The most significant number of projects to create smart cities were implemented in European cities. Researchers from the UK made a substantial contribution to the development of international standards. In Russian practice, this topic is just beginning its development, both in legal and regulatory documents and in economic research. An important step in solving this problem should be the implementation of the national program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” and the project “Smart City” in the framework of the national project “Housing and Urban Environment” in 2019.
About the Author
N. Yu. PivkinaRussian Federation
Pivkina N. Yu., Post-graduate student, Faculty of Economics
References
1. Акоев М. А., Маркусова В. А., Москалева О. В., Писляков В. В. Руководство по наукометрии: индикаторы развития науки и технологии. Монография. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та; 2014. 250 с. Akoev M. A., Markusova V. A., Moskaleva O. V., Pislyakov V. V. The Russian Scientometric Handbook: Indicators of science and technology. Ekaterinburg: Publishing house of Ural University; 2014. 250 p. (In Russ.).
2. Куприяновский В. П., Буланча С. А., Кононов В. В., Черных К. Ю., Намнот Д. Е., Добрынин А. П. Умные города как «Столицы» цифровой экономики. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2016;2(4):41–52. Kuprijanovskij V. P. et al. Smart Cities as the “capitals” of the digital economy. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2016; 2(4):41–52. (In Russ.).
3. Albino V., Berardi U., Dangelico R. M. Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology. 2015;22(1):3–21.
4. Angelidou M. The Role of Smart Characteristics in the Plans of Fifteen Cities. Journal of Urban Technology. 2017;4(24):3–28.
5. Neirotti P., De Marco A., Cagliano A. C., Mangano G., Scorrano F. Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylized facts. Cities. 2014;38:25–36.
6. Caragliu A., Del Bo C., Nijkamp P. Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban technology. 2011;2(18):65–82.
7. Giffinger R., Gurdum H. Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of cities? ACE: Architecture, City and Environment. 2010;4(12):7–26.
8. Camboim G. F., Zawislak P. A., Pufal N. A. Driving elements to make cities smarter: Evidences from European projects. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2019;(142):154–167.
9. De Jong M., Joss S., Schraven D., Zhan C., Weijnen M. Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;(109):25–38.
10. Hollands F. G. Will the real smart city please stand up? City. 2008;12(3):303–320.
11. Nam T., Pardo T. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times. New York: ACM. 2011;(12):282–291.
12. Coelho J., Cacho N., Lopes F., Loiola E. et al. ROTA: A smart city platform to improve public safety. New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. 2016;(444):787–796.
13. Joshi S. et al. Developing smart cities: an integrated framework. Procedia Computer Science. 2016;(93):902–909.
14. Bakici T., Almirall E., Wareham J. A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2013:4(2):135–148.
15. McKinsey Global Institute Smart Cities: Digital Solutions for a More Livable Future June 2018. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/capital%20projects%20and%20infrastructure/our%20insights/smart%20cities%20digital%20solutions%20for%20a%20more%20livable%20future/mgismart-cities-full-report.ashx.
Review
For citations:
Pivkina N.Yu. Smart Cities as a New Quality of Life Standard. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019;9(4):120-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-4-120-125