The Influence of Digital Communications on Political Participation
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-4-63-69
Abstract
The article provides a review of studies assessing the effects of digital communication technologies on the political participation of citizens. Political participation is understood as civic engagement. The author considers the changes in the forms of political participation of citizens in the transition of digital communications from unidirectional information technologies Web 1.0 to interactive technologies Web 2.0 used in social media. Evaluation of the impact of digital communications on public activity is shown from various well-founded positions of ‘cyber-pessimists’ and ‘cyberoptimists’. Pessimists note the negative effects of the increased use of digital communications, which consist of social disunity, the erosion of social capital and, as a result, in a decrease in civil and political activity. In turn, optimists argue that the intensive use of digital communications has opened up opportunities for access to the necessary information and the creation of new forms of political participation, significantly reducing the cost (time, effort) of mobilising supporters and coordinating action. Moreover, digital media has created conditions for the implementation of creative and non-political formats of participation, which are often transformed into political actions. Based on the metadata, the author concluded it is necessary to strengthen and diversity of the effects of digital communication on civic and political participation.
About the Author
R. V. Pyrma
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pyrma R. V., Ph.D. of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Political Sciences and Mass Communications
References
1. Barrett M., Zani B. Political and Civic Engagement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge; 2014. 562 p.
2. Mccartney A. R.M., Bennion E. A., Simpson D. W. Teaching Civic Engagement: From Student to Active Citizen. Washington: American Political Science Association; 2013; 536 p.
3. Putnam R. Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. Political Science and Politics. 1995;28(4):664–683.
4. Putnam R. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000. 357 p.
5. Howard P. N. New media campaigns and the managed citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. 264 p.
6. Bimber B. The Internet and citizen communication with government: Does the medium matter? Political Communication. 1999;16:409–429.
7. Weber L. M., Loumakis A., Bergman J. Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review. 2003;21:26–42.
8. Norris P. A Virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
9. Barber B. The uncertainty of digital politics: Democracy’s uneasy relationship with information technology. Harvard International Review. 2001;23:42–48.
10. Carpini D. Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication. 2000;17:341–350.
11. Polat R. K. The Internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links. European Journal of Communication. 2005;20:435–459.
12. Boulianne Sh. Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research. Political Communication. 2009;26:2:193–211.
13. Macafee T., De Simone J. J. Killing the bill online? Pathways to young people’s protest engagement via social media. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2012;15(11):579–584.
14. Gil de Zúñiga H., Copeland L., Bimber B. Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection. New Media & Society. 2013;16(3):488–506.
15. Valenzuela S. Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist. 2013;57(7):920–942.
16. Boulianne Sh. Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society. 2015;18(5):524–538.
17. Петухов В. В., Бараш Р. Э., Седова Н. Н., Петухов Р. В. Гражданский активизм в России: мотивация, ценности и формы участия. Власть. 2014;(9):11–19. Petukhov V. V., Barash R. E., Sedova N. N., Petukhov R. V. Civic activism in Russia: Motivation, values and forms of participation. Vlast. 2014;(9):11–19. (In Russ.).
18. Dimitrova D. V., Shehata A., Strömbäck J., Nord L. W. The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research. 2014;41(1):95–118.
19. Holt K., Shehata A., Strömbäck J., Ljungberg E. Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller? European Journal of Communication. 2013;28(1):19–34.
20. Towner T. All political participation is socially networked? New media and the 2012 election. Social Science Computer Review. 2013;31(5):527–541.
21. Tang G., Francis L. F. Lee. Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review. 2013;31(6):763–773.
22. Gil de Zúñiga H., Jung N., Valenzuela S. Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2012;17:319–336.
23. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Brashears M. E. Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades. American Sociological Review. 2006;71(3):353–375.
24. Bode L., Vraga E. K., Borah P., Shah D. V. A new space for political behavior: Political, social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2014;19:414–429.
25. Vitak J., Zube P., Smock A., Carr C.-T., Ellison N., Lampe C. It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2011;14(3):107–114.
26. Xenos M., Vromen A., Loader B. D. The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society. 2014;17(2):151–167.
27. Mitchell A., Gottfried J., Barthel M. Trump, Clinton Voters Divided in Their Main Source for Election News, 2017. URL: https://www.journalism.org/2017/01/18/trump-clinton-voters-divided-in-their-main-source-for-election-news/(дата обращения/accessed on 03.07.2019).
28. Theocharis Y., Quintelier E. Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment? The effect of Facebook on adolescent participation. New Media & Society. 2016;18(5):817–836.
29. Zhang W., Seltzer T., Bichard S. L. Two sides of the coin: Assessing the influence of social network site use during the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign. Social Science Computer Review. 2013;31(5):542–551.
30. Ekström M., Östman J. Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of Internet use on youth democratic engagement. Communication Research. 2015;42(6):796–818.
31. Gil de Zúñiga H., Molyneux L., Zheng P. Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication. 2014;64(4):612–634.
32. Plutzer E. Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review. 2002;96(1):41–56.
33. Ito M., Baumer S., Bittanti M., Boyd D. et al. Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009. 440 p.
34. Van Deth J. W. A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica. 2014;49(3):349–367.
35. Hooghe M. Defining political participation: How to pinpoint an elusive target? Acta Politica. 2014;49(3):338–341.
36. Kahne J., Bowyer B. The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks. Political Communication. 2018;35(3):470–493.
37. Soep E. Participatory Politics: Next-Generation Tactics to Remake Public Spheres; 2014. URL: https://ypp.dmlcentral.net/sites/default/files/publications/Participatory_Politics_Next_Generation.pdf (дата обращения/accessed on03.07.2019).
38. Boulianne S., Theocharis Y. Young people, digital media, and engagement: a meta-analysis of research; 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814190 (дата обращения/accessed on 03.07.2019).
39. Theocharis Y., Van Deth J. The continuous expansion of citizen participation: A new taxonomy. European Political Science Review. 2018;10(1):139–163.
40. Dalton R. J. Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation. Political Studies. 2008;56(1):76–98.
41. Dalton R. J. The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics. CQ Press; 2015. 240 p.
Review
For citations:
Pyrma R.V. The Influence of Digital Communications on Political Participation. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019;9(4):63-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-4-63-69
Views:
1489
Email this article 