Preview

Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University

Advanced search

Russia’s Role in the Formation of the Conceptual Provisions of the Eurasian security

https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-5-56-65

Abstract

The article analyses the main concepts in the field of security that Russia proposed in the space of “Greater Eurasia” . By “Greater Eurasia” the author’s team means the area of the entire Eurasian continent from Western Europe to Southeast Asia . The most challenging problems to the formation of a unified security system, the authors include the presence within these limits of a large number of diverse macro-regions, as well as features of the political situation at the current historical stage . Therefore, the authors consider the basics of security in Eurasia through the prism of security of two continents of the same continent-Europe and Asia . If we make a comparative analysis between these two regions, we can see that the institutions for regional security in Europe are at a higher institutional level, but the Asian part of the continent is entirely free from various kinds of moral consequences of the “cold war” . These circumstances make this region more promising in terms of the basis for building a unified security system capable of covering the entire continent . This trend is a logical continuation of the fact that the centres of gravity of global politics and the economy in the last two decades began to move towards South-East Asia .

About the Authors

K. P. Kurylev
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Konstantin P. Kurylev —  Doctor of Sciences (History), Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations,


N. S. Danyuk
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Nikita S. Danyuk —  Candidate of Sciences (History), First Deputy Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies and Forecasting


E. V. Semibratov
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Semibratov —  Assistant Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies and Forecasting, PhD student at the Department of Theory and History of International Relations


M. A. Nikulin
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Maxim A. Nikulin —  Assistant at the Department of Theory and History of International Relations


References

1. Bazavluk S. V. Eurasianism: Terminological ambivalence. Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: International relations. 2018;2(18):273–283. (In Russ.).

2. Kramer M. The Myth of a No-NATO-Enlargement Pledge to Russia. The Washington Quarterly. — Elliott School of International Affairs. 2009;2(32):39–61.

3. Zhurbej E. V. The Treaty on European security: the prospects of Russian initiatives. Ecumene. Regional studies. 2010;1:81–91. (In Russ.).

4. Glazyev S. Ukrainian catastrophe: From American aggression to world war? (“Izborsky club collection”). Moscow; 2015: 93. (In Russ.).

5. Kurylev K. P., Stanis D. V. Ethno-confessional situation in Ukraine as a factor of internal political instability. Historical, philosophical, political and legal Sciences, cultural studies and art history. Theory and practice. 2014;5(Part 2):114–117. (In Russ.).

6. Kurylev K. P., Naryshkin V. S., Zinkovskaya E., Rakhimov K. H. Eurasian Economic Union in the foreign policy strategy of Russia. Vestnik of RUDN University, international relations series. 2016;1(16):75–86. (In Russ.).

7. Putin V. V. A new integration project for Eurasia — the future that is born today. URL: http://izvestia.ru/ news/502761 (accessed on 06.12.2019). (In Russ.).

8. Ivanova N. I., ed. Primakov Our. Moscow: Master; 2016:224. (In Russ.).

9. Ibragimov A. G. The CSTO as an instrument of regional security. In Post-Soviet studies. 2019;4(2). URL: https://docs. wixstatic.com/ugd/0206eb_5e38eedba3ea4afea31b338b57f54b17.pdf (accessed on 06.12.2019). (In Russ.).

10. Troitskiy E. F., Zinoviev E. P. Organization of the collective security Treaty: formation, evolution and crisis of the military-political Union. Rusyns. 2018;54:335–351. (In Russ.).

11. Kulik S. Collective Security Treaty Organization: Responsible security. Moscow: Institute of modern development; 2011:32. URL: https://mgimo.ru/upload/iblock/387/387c908802e9e63682c179e862b81342.pdf (accessed on 06.12.2019). (In Russ.).

12. Kulik S. Collective Security Treaty Organization: Responsible security. Moscow: Institute of modern development; 2011:32. URL: https://mgimo.ru/upload/iblock/387/387c908802e9e63682c179e862b81342.pdf (accessed on 06.12.2019). (In Russ.).

13. Commissina I. N., Kurtov A. A. Shanghai cooperation organization. In: Kozhokin E. M., ed. Moscow: RISI; 2005:117. (In Russ.).

14. Zimonin V. P. Shanghai cooperation organisation and the Eurasian dimension of security. In Shanghai cooperation organisation: towards new frontiers of development: Materials of the round table. Moscow: Institute of Far East. Russian Academy of Sciences; 2008:202. (In Russ.).

15. Kaukenov A. China’s Policy in the Shanghai cooperation organisation. Central Asia and Caucasus. 2007;3(51):73–89. (In Russ.).

16. Koltunov A. A. influence of the Shanghai organisation of cooperation on development and security in the Central Asian region. In Shanghai cooperation organisation: towards new frontiers of development: Materials of the round table. Moscow: Institute of Far East. Russian Academy of Sciences; 2008:257–258. (In Russ.).

17. Kharina O. A. India’s strategic interests in the SCO: Energy and security. Vestnik RUDN. Series: International relations. 2017;(17)3:508–517. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/231306602017173508517


Review

For citations:


Kurylev K.P., Danyuk N.S., Semibratov E.V., Nikulin M.A. Russia’s Role in the Formation of the Conceptual Provisions of the Eurasian security. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019;9(5):56-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-5-56-65

Views: 631


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-7867 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1482 (Online)