The Prohibition of Communist Symbols in Post-Communist Countries
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-4-36-45
Abstract
The article focuses on communist symbols bans in post-communist countries. The author highlights the influence of various conditions such as existence as a part of USSR or Russian empire, the experience of independent state-building in XX century, membership in European Union, lack of dominant political actor and resources for his long domination, the popularity of successor parties, the radicalism of institutional reforms. The analysis also accounts associated impacts of international environment and relations of post-communist countries with Russia. Based on a combination of various conditions, the author develops a typology of post-communist states where communist symbols have been banned.
About the Author
E. Yu. Meleshkina
MGIMO(University) under The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Meleshkina E. Yu., Dr Sci. in Political Sciences, Head of Political Science Department, INION RAS; Professor
References
1. Brubaker R. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004. 283 p.
2. Koposov N. Memory Laws, Memory Wars: The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. 338 p.
3. Мелешкина Е. Ю. Постимперские пространства: Особенности формирования государств и наций. Политическая наука. 2013;(3):10–29. Meleshkina E. Yu. Post-imperial spaces: Peculiarities of state and nation-building. Politicheskaya nauka. 2013;(3):10–29. (In Russ.).
4. Мелешкина Е. Ю. Формирование новых государств в Восточной Европе: монография. М.: ИНИОН РАН; 2012. 252 c. Meleshkina E. Yu. Formation of new States in Eastern Europe: Monograph. Moscow: INION RAN; 2012. 252 p. (In Russ.).
5. Mälksoo M. ‘Memory must be defended’: Beyond the politics of mnemonical security. Security Dialogue. 2015:46(3):221–237.
6. Stark D., Bruszt L. Post-socialist pathways: Transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press; 1998. 300 p.
7. Grzymala-Buss A. Redeeming the Past: the Regeneration of the Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe after 1989. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press; 2002. 341 p.
8. Huntington S. P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Last Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 1993.
9. Welsh H. Dealing with the Communist Past: Central and East European Experiences after 1990. Europe- Asia Studies. 1996;48(3):419–428.
10. McFaul M. The fourth wave of democracy and dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World. World Politics. 2002;54(1):212–244.
11. Мелешкина Е. Ю. Государственное строительство и институциональная трансплантация в посткоммунистических странах. Политическая наука. 2016;(4):186–213. Meleshkina E. Yu. State-Building and Institutional Transplantation in Post-Communist Countries. Politicheskaya nauka. 2016;(4):186–213. (In Russ.).
12. Scharpf F. Institutions in comparative policy research. Comparative political studies. 2000;33(6–7):762–790.
13. Capoccia G., Kelemen D. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics. 2007;59(2):341–369.
14. Mahoney J. The legacies of liberalism: Path dependence and political regimes in Central America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001. 416 p.
15. Pierson P., Skocpol T. Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science: Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association Meetings. Washington, D.C.; 2000.
16. Frye T. Building States and Markets after Communism: The Perils of Polarized Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. 296 p.
17. Palonen E. Political Polarisation and Populism in Contemporary Hungary. Parliamentary Affairs. 2009;62(2):318–334.
18. Belavusau U., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A. Memory Laws: Mapping a New Subject in Comparative Law and Transitional Justice. In: Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. U. Belavusau, A. Gliszczyńska-Grabias, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
19. Marples D. R. Decommunization, Memory Laws, and “Builders of Ukraine in the 20th Century”. Acta Slavica Iaponica, 2018;(39):1–22.
20. Мелешкина Е. Ю. Отвергая символику прошлого: влияние условий политического развития на принятие законов о декоммунизации. Политическая наука. 2018;(1):148–172. Meleshkina E. Yu. Rejecting symbols of the past: Impact of political conditions on de-communisation laws. Politicheskaya nauka. 2018;(1):148–172. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Meleshkina E.Yu. The Prohibition of Communist Symbols in Post-Communist Countries. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019;9(4):36-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-4-36-45
Views:
590
Email this article 