The Religious Factor in the Politics of Memory in Contemporary Russia and Belarus: Comparative Analysis

The article attempts to analyse the role of the religious factor in the formation and implementation of Politics of memory in modern Russia and Belarus. The urgency of work is caused by the increasing role of the religious factor in the politics of memory of the two States in the first decade of XXI century the research Objective — identify and similarities in the manifestations of the religious factor in the politics of memory of Russia and Belarus. For this purpose, we identified the subjects and mechanisms of interaction of state and religious institutions in the formation and implementation of memory policy. We showed that in Russia, religious organisations have a greater subjectivity in the politics of memory and can form a complementary discourse of memory and expand it at the expense of their system of interpretation of the past. As concerns the religious factor of the processes of political socialisation in the context of the policy of memory we revealed in the interaction of religious organisations of the two countries with the systems of public education and the armed forces. We concluded the similarity of the strategies of this interaction in Russia and Belarus. We showed that in both states, the selective interaction with religious organisations is carried out according to the criterion of their tradition. We also concluded that religious organisations do not form adversarial, but complementary channels of socialisation in the implementation of the state policy of memory. The process of creating a symbolic space and the possibility of participation of religious organisations, especially the Russian Orthodox Church, which is a key actor here, is also analysed. We also studied the religious factor of memory policy in the context of integration of Russia and Belarus. We concluded that the attempts to use it building the value basis of integration on the concepts of the collective historical past have not yet been successful, but such an opportunity remains.

1. Miller A. I. The Role of expert communities in the politics of memory in Russia. Politia: Analiz. Khronoka. Prognoz. 2013;4(71):114–126. (In Russ.).

2. Syrov V. N., Golovkina O. V., Anikin D. A. et al. The conceptual basis of memory policy and prospects of postnational identity. Tomsk: Publishing House of Tomsk State University; 2019. 221 p. (In Russ.).

3. Methodological issues of studying memory policy: A collection of scientific papers. Miller A. I., Efremenko D. V., eds. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Nestor-History; 2018. 223 p. (In Russ.).

4. Bordyugov G., Bukharev A. Yesterday’s tomorrow: How “national stories” were written in the USSR and how they are written now. Moscow: AIRO-XXI; 2011. 247 p. (In Russ.).

5. Achkasov V. A. “Politics of memory” as a tool for building post-socialist nations. Zhurnal sotsiologuii i sotsialinoi antropoloduii. 2013;(4):106–123. (In Russ.).

6. Titov V. V. The politics of memory and formation of national-state identity: The Russian experience and new trends. Moscow: Vash format; 2017. 181 p. (In Russ.).

7. National history in Soviet and post-Soviet States. K. Eimermacher, G. Bordugov, eds. Moscow: Friedrich Naumann Foundation, AIRO-XX; 2003. 432 p. (In Russ.).

8. National history in the post-Soviet space — II. Bomsdorf F., Bordyugov G., eds. Moscow: Friedrich Naumann Foundation, AIRO-XXI; 2009. 372 p. (In Russ.).

9. Mitrofanova A. V. The politicisation of orthodox world. Moscow: Nauka; 2004. 293 p. (In Russ.).

10. Rastimeshina T. V. Policy of the Russian state about the cultural heritage of the Church: Traditional approaches and innovative technologies. Moscow: MGOU; 2012. 291 p. (In Russ.).

11. Dontsev S. P. The Politics of Memory in the context of institutional interactions of the Russian Orthodox Church and the state in modern Russia. Polilicheskaya nauka. 2018:(3):110–128. (In Russ.).

12. Shevtsov Y. United Nation. The Phenomenon of Belarus. Moscow: Europe; 256 p. (In Russ.).

13. Uvarova T. B. New Russian borderland: Post-Soviet Belarus from a socio-anthropological perspective. Rossia i sovremenniy mir. 2018;1(98):172–187. (In Russ.).

14. Kurilo N. A. Values as an essential basis of the integration policy of the Republic of Belarus. Nauchnye trudy vyshey shkoly. 2015;(14):60–66. (In Russ.).

15. Dontsev S. P. The Russian Orthodox Church and the State at the turn of XX–XXI centuries: Problems of interaction. Moscow: Russian State Humanitarian University; 2014. 230 p. (In Russ.).

16. Borisov N. A. Formation of national ideology and the problem of legitimacy of the political regime: On the example of the ideology of the Belarusian state. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Zarubezhnoe regionovedenie. Vostokovedenie. 2012;1(82):29–40. (In Russ.).

17. Dontsev S. P. State, Army, Church: The issues of institutional interaction. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoria i practica. 2015;1(121):42–47. (In Russ.).

18. Shadursky V. G. Historical policy in the Republic of Belarus: stages of development and versions of interpretation of the past. Trudy fakulteta mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy Beloruskogo gosugarstvennogo universiteta. Minsk: BSU. 2014;(5):9–24. (In Russ.).

19. Semenenko I. S., Lapkin V. V., Bardin A. L., Pantin V. I. Between the state and the nation: Dilemmas of identity policy in the post-Soviet space. Polis. Polticheskie issledovania. 2017;(5):54–78. (In Russ.).

20. Biketova E. A., Chernyshov Yu. G. Nation-building of the Republic of Belarus and the European component of the Belarusian identity. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia = World economy and international relations. 2018;1(62):94–103. (In Russ.).

21. Aleinikova S. M. “Russian world”, “canonical territory” and “Holy Russia”: The ratio of concepts. Religiya i obshestvo. 2016:11–14. (In Russ.).

22. Pivovar E. I. Russian language and the Russian world as factors of social and cultural dialogue in the post- Soviet space. Gumanitarnye chtenia. Moscow: RGGU; 2010:167–170. (In Russ.).