Preview

Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University

Advanced search

Implementation of Large Infrastructure Projects in Russia with the Help of State Corporations

https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-3-112-119

Abstract

The relevance of the research topic is due to the key role of large infrastructure projects in ensuring economic development and improving the quality of life of citizens. In the current conditions, the implementation of such large-scale initiatives is increasingly carried out with the participation of state corporations, which requires an in-depth study of the features and effectiveness of their application. The purpose of the study is to identify the key factors determining the effectiveness of state corporations. An analysis of the literature on the topic revealed a number of problems: the patterns of interaction of these structures with regional and municipal authorities, as well as a comprehensive assessment of their impact on the socio-economic development of territories, have not been sufficiently studied. During the preparation of the article, the author conducted a review of scientific publications, systematized key approaches, made conclusions about the need for further improvement of the regulatory framework, modernization of public-private partnership mechanisms, as well as strengthening coordination between various participants in the investment and construction process. As a novelty, the experience of foreign countries is systematized and the author’s position regarding its applicability in Russia is formulated. At the same time, the author of the article analyzes the empirical material of the implementation of infrastructure policy in Russia with the help of state corporations. Such large domestic corporations as Rosatom, VTB Group, VEB.RF, and Rostec were taken as the main research cases, and based on them, a comparative analysis was conducted and the strengths and weaknesses of government policy in this area were identified.. The results presented in the article will be useful to government authorities, corporate management, and the scientific community engaged in research in the field of infrastructure management.

About the Author

V. A. Terentiev
Russian University of Transport (MIIT)
Russian Federation

Vitaly A. Terentiev — Applicant, Employee of the Basic Training Academy

Moscow



References

1. Belyakov I. V. On quantitative risk assessment of infrastructure projects with state participation. Issues of state and municipal management. 2022;4:30–60. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1999–5431–2022–0–4–30–60

2. Kalendzhyan S. O. Trends in the development of the institutional environment within the framework of the use of public-private partnership mechanisms in modern Russia. Economics, entrepreneurship and law. 2024;14(4):1257–1270. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/epp.14.4.120889

3. Parfenova D. A. State corporations and their role in the revival and modernization of Russian industry (on the example of the Rostec State Corporation). Via Scientiarum — The Road of Knowledge. 2019;2:40–45. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/mdpkmw (In Russ.).

4. Tamaev T. R. State-owned companies and corporations, companies with state participation: Commonality of public law interests in civil turnover. Law and management. 2023;9:148–151. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2224–9133–2023–9–148–151

5. Bennon M., Fukuyama F. The obsolescing bargain crosses the belt and road initiative: Renegotiations on BRI projects. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2022;38(2):278–301. URL: https://fsi.stanford.edu/publication/obsolescing-bargain-crosses-belt-and-road-initiative-renegotiations-bri-projects

6. Bond P. Blue economy threats, contradictions and resistances seen from South Africa. Journal of Political Ecology. 2019;26(1):341–362. DOI: 10.2458/v26i1.23504

7. Dementiev V. State corporations. Russia: Strategy, Policy and Administration. London: 2018:381–391. DOI:10.1057/978–1–137–56671–3_33

8. Gailhofer P. et al. Corporate liability for transboundary environmental harm. Cham: Springer Nature; 2023. 640 p. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–031–13264–3

9. Freelove S., Gramatki Iu. Creating long-term social value on major infrastructure projects: A case study. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability. 2022;175(4):186–193. URL: https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/abs/10.1680/jensu.21.00082

10. Kiboi A. W., Maalu Ja. K. Employee perception of performance contracting in state corporations. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management. 2023;8(1):41–63. DOI: 10.47941/jepm.1307

11. Kiboi A. W., Maalu Ja. K. Management perception of performance contracting in state corporations. International Journal of Supply Chain and Logistics. 2023;7(2):1–26. DOI: 10.47941/ijscl.1308

12. Kuropyatnik E. Financing of large infrastructure projects: Chinese experience and Russian practice. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2022;10(2):56–90. DOI: 10.26794/2308–944X-2022–10–2–56–90

13. Shlafman A. I. Management and infrastructure of promising international projects in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. Components of Scientific and Technological Progress. 2021;5(59):16–19. URL: https://elibrary.ru/katpla

14. Chernyak T. A. Management of infrastructural support for the development of Arctic territories. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Economy. 2024;65:47–60. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17223/19988648/65/4


Review

For citations:


Terentiev V.A. Implementation of Large Infrastructure Projects in Russia with the Help of State Corporations. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2025;15(3):112-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-3-112-119

Views: 19


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-7867 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1482 (Online)