Humanities Technologies in Education: Antropological Turn in the Period of Digital Transformation
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-3-21-30
Abstract
The article reveals general ideas about the content and functions of humanitarian technologies in education, which can be aimed both at the usage of human development methods and the introduction of behavior management methods. The author’s conceptualization of humanitarian technologies in the educational sphere is proposed, and the key characteristics of this category at the current stage are highlighted. Based on a review of scientific publications, the author identifies teaching methods for achieving the set goal and influence techniques for performing the necessary actions. The article explores the transition of humanitarian technologies in education from traditional methods to digital tools of anthropocentric practices. The article also offers a comparative analysis of traditional teaching aids and new educational practices implemented based on humanitarian technologies, mainly of a digital type. The author notes that humanitarian technologies overcome the technocratic paradigm, forming co-development ecosystems, where technologies activate the increase in human potential. The article proposes key areas for the development of the concept of humanitarian technologies in the field of education, contained in modern academic discourse.
Keywords
humanitarian technologies,
teaching methods,
anthropotechnics,
professional competencies,
algorithmic management,
educational ecosystem
Supporting agencies: This work was carried out as part of a state assignment from the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation [topic No. 125062507558–8 (“Development of methods for preventing the negative consequences of destructive informational and psychological influences on children and young people in the digital communications space”)].
About the Author
R. V. Parma
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; Moscow State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman V. Parma — Cand. Sci. (Political), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Political Science of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications; Leading Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Parma R. V., Suchilina A. A. Diskurs gumanitarnyh tehnologij v sovremennyh nauchnyh issledovanijah: otechestvennyj opyt i zarubezhnaja praktika. Vlast’. 2025;33(1):51–56. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2071–5358–2025–1–51–56
2. Petrusevich A. A. Fundamentals of practical pedagogy: A textbook for students of pedagogical educational institutions. Omsk: OmGPU Publishing House; 2010. 180 p. (In Russ.).
3. Goncharov S. A. Humanitarian technologies in education and the social sphere. Bulletin of the Herzen University. 2008;5(55):9–15. URL: https://elibrary.ru/nszezt (In Russ.).
4. Solomin V. P. Humanitarian technologies as an innovation in education. Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University. 2011;4(106):124–127. URL: https://elibrary.ru/nweeal (In Russ.).
5. Vygotskij L. S. Vygotsky L. S. Psychology of human development. Moscow: Sense; Eksmo; 2005. 1136 p. (In Russ.).
6. Mitin A. E., Filippov S. O. Humanitarian technologies: substantiation of the main provisions of their application in education. Knowledge. Understanding. Ability. 2013;3:255–262. URL: https://elibrary.ru/rbovvz (In Russ.).
7. Sorokopud Ju.V., Klimenko O. V., Hadikova E. N., Korsun D. A. Application of humanitarian technologies in higher professional education. Scientific and methodological electronic journal “Concept”. 2014;12:396–400. URL: https://elibrary.ru/scezaz (In Russ.).
8. Rozin V. M. About the possibility of building humanitarian technology. Ideas and ideals. 2017;1(31):9–22. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17212/2075–0862–2017–1.1–9–22
9. Kozhemjakin M. V. From humanitarian knowledge to humanitarian technology. Electronic scientific and educational bulletin “Health and education in the 21st century”. 2018;20(7):58–63. URL: https://elibrary.ru/uwivlc (In Russ.).
10. Filippova S. O., Mitin A. E., Solomin V. P. Humanitarian technologies in physical education: A manual for teachers. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2017. 258 p. (In Russ.).
11. Nehorosheva K. I. The problem of humanitarian technologies: The specifics of the approach of French education. Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Philosophy. 2019;1(31):14–20. URL: https://elibrary.ru/ozkdzf (In Russ.).
12. Robotova A. S. Humanitarianism and humanitarian technologies. Bulletin of the Herzen University; 2008;5(55):15–20. URL: https://elibrary.ru/nszfad (In Russ.).
13. Bordovskij G. A. Humanitarian technologist: from idea to implementation. Bulletin of the Herzen University;2007;10(48):3–5. URL: https://elibrary.ru/nwzpdv (In Russ.).
14. Reznik Ju. M. Social engineering as a profession. Proceedings of Tomsk Polytechnic University. 2011;318(6):124–130. URL: https://elibrary.ru/nuwhmp (In Russ.).
15. Sloterdijk P. You must change your life. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. 500 p.
16. Kicherova M. N., Trifonova I. S. Principles of an ecosystem approach: Opportunities for modeling an educational ecosystem. Science for Education Today. 2023;13(3):45–72. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15293/2658–6762.2303.03
17. Berry D. M., Fagerjord A. Digital humanities: Knowledge and critique in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Books; 2017. 248 p.
18. Fuko M. Tehnologii sebja. Logos. 2008;2(65):96–122. URL: https://elibrary.ru/tjlkcx (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Parma R.V. Humanities Technologies in Education: Antropological Turn in the Period of Digital Transformation. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2025;15(3):21-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-3-21-30
Views:
18
Email this article 