Dynamics of Priorities and Geopolitical Situation in the System of National Interests of Russia and Afghanistan

The establishment by the Taliban* of de facto control over the territory of Afghanistan in 2021 after the withdrawal of U.S . troops determines the relevance of the study on the foreign policy of the country, on which a number of regional and continental projects depend, guarantees of security of the strategically important for the Russian Federation region of Central Asia . The prerequisites for the formation of national interests of Afghanistan and the Russian Federation, their declared priorities and implementation in the framework of foreign policy are considered . The study is based on a dialectical approach . The research used systematic, institutional approaches and statistical methods, methods of content analysis, qualitative analysis of thematic publications, methods of historical research of factors and conditions of implementation of foreign policy of states . Official documents reflecting the composition of national interests, statements of political elites, publications in periodicals, data of national accounts systems and international organizations were used as sources of information . The results obtained indecate similarities and differences in the composition of priorities of foreign policy of the Russian Federation and Afghanistan in the XXI century, the desire for sovereignty as the basic trend of the policy pursued by the countries . It is shown that for both countries the pursuit of sovereignty in foreign policy is associated with the aggravation of confrontation with the United States and its partner countries in military-political and economic alliances . The article illustrates the differences in the state of sovereignty guarantees between Russian and Afghan foreign policy . The author presents arguments in favor of the irreversibility of appealing to regional and global centers of power in the foreign policy of both countries in order to increase their legitimacy, strengthen their resource potential and, ultimately, conduct an independent domestic and foreign policy . Further research on the selected issues is mainly determined by the accumulation of empirical data on the Taliban’s foreign policy and the formal declaration of its goals.

* It is recognized as a terrorist organization in the Russian Federation.

1. Selukov A.D. National interests as the basis of statehood. Legal Science in China and Russia. 2023;(6):12–21. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17803/2587-9723.2023.6.012-021

2. Shevchenko O.M., Shtofer L.L. Role of political elite in ensuring national security of the state: Russia vs West. Humanitarian of the South of Russia. 2024;13(5):133–144. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2024.5.8

3. Tsygankov A.P. Russia’s foreign policy: towards a comprehensive understanding. Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations. 2020;(3):441–448. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-3-441-448

4. Saleem S.M. et al. Afghanistan: Decades of collective trauma, ongoing humanitarian crises, Taliban rulers, and mental health of the displaced population. Asian journal of psychiatry. 2021;65:102854. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102854

5. Tsygankov A.P. Hans Morgenthau: A look at foreign policy. Power and Democracy: Foreign Scientists on Political Science. М.; 1992:162–163. (In Russ.).

6. Stolkov D.S. The language of diplomacy of the multipolar world. Toward the release of the foreign policy concept of 2023. Obozrevatel. 2023;5(400):33–42. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.48137/2074-2975_2023_5_33

7. Boskholov S.S. In search of the balance of interests of the individual, society and the state in the sphere of ensuring national security: Academic Law Journal. 2023;3(93):288–292. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17150/1819–0928.2023.24(3).288–292

8. Obukhova A.N. Significance and prospects of international partnership with Afghanistan in the field of energy, logistics, technology. Bulletin of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2024;3(29):320–332. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2024-3-320-332

9. Malik E.N. Transformation of the political system in Afghanistan: the problems of forming an “inclusive government”. Izvestiya South-West State University. Series: History and Law. 2022;12(1):162–173. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-1-162-173

10. Nessar O.M. Ethno-tribal factor and political process in modern Afghanistan. Islam in the Near and Middle East. 2015;(9):379–383. URL: https://elibrary.ru/vduvyf (In Russ.).

11. Jabeen M., Mazhar P.D. M. S., Goraya N.S. US Afghan Relations: A Historical Perspective of Events of 9/11. South Asian Studies. 2020;25(1):143–173. URL: http://111.68.103.26/journals/index.php/IJSAS/article/viewFile/2781/1039

12. Sushentsov A.A. Evolution of US Central Asian Policy: Between the Withdrawal of Soviet Troops from Afghanistan and the Beginning of the «War on Terror» (1989–2001). Yearbook of the Institute of International Studies of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 2014;1(7):22–39. URL: https://elibrary.ru/tkjtkr (In Russ.).

13. Boni F. Afghanistan 2021: Us withdrawal, the Taliban return and regional geopolitics. Asia Maior. 2022;32:375–391. URL: https://oro.open.ac.uk/84362/1/16-AM2021-Afghanistan.pdf

14. Bashir M., Bashir N. A critical review of policy shift in Pak-Afghan-US relations after withdrawal OF USSR from Afghanistan (1988–2023). Journal of Arts & Social Sciences. 2024;11(2):79–88. URL: https://ojs.jass.pk/ojs/index.php/jass/article/download/495/192

15. Miller L. Biden’s Afghanistan Withdrawal: A Verdict on the Limits of American Power. Tailor & Francis Online. 2021:37–44. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2021.1930404

16. Belokrenitsky V. Ya., Sikoev R.R. Taliban Movement and Prospects of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2014. 216 p. URL: https://book.ivran.ru/f/dvizhenie-taliban-i-perspektivy-afganistana-i-pakistana.pdf?ysclid=mb825s6aom689602147 (In Russ.).

17. Laumulin M. Central Asian policy of the USA under the presidency of B. Obama. Central Asia and Caucasus. 2010;13(4):47–62. URL: https://elibrary.ru/pxsfpn (In Russ.).

18. Okimbekov U.V. Afghanistan 2023: socio-political and economic situation. Bulletin of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2024;3(29):301–311. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31696/2618–7302–2024–3–301–311

19. Kefeli I.F., Komleva N.A. Projects of Greater Eurasia and “Great Turan” — a way to unite peoples? Problems of National Strategy. 2023;4(79):82–105. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52311/2079–3359_2023_4_82

20. Klimenko A.F. China, Russia and other SCO participants in the new Afghan realities. China in world and regional politics. History and Modernity. 2022;27(27):160–175. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.48647/IFES.2022.22.71.020

21. Bahadari A.F. The Revival of the Taliban in Afghanistan in the context of the withdrawal of american forces: Prospects for the movement and relations with Russia. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2022;(4):163–172. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21869/2223–1501–2022–12–4–163–172

22. Tsygankov A. P. Change of Epochs. Russian Westernism and International Relations. Russia in Global Politics. 2024;22–2(126):196–212.(In Russ.). DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-2-196-212