On the Issue of the Conceptual Justification of the Unification of the USRB in Modern Discourse
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-1-53-63
Abstract
The article discusses issues of theoretical understanding and conceptual foundations of Russian-Belarusian integration, which found expression in the formation and development of the Union State (USRB). The relevance of the topic is due to the fact that the understanding of the process of unification of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus, carried out by both theorists and practitioners of Russian and Belarusian politics, serves as its conceptual basis. The difference in the stages of understanding integration transformations reflects changes in geopolitical and domestic factors that have accompanied the process of formation of the USRB over the past decades. The purpose of the article was to analyze and periodize the theoretical understanding and conceptual justification of Russian-Belarusian integration aimed at building the Union State. Its objectives: 1. to define and compare the main stages of theoretical understanding of the USRB and its integration prerequisites; 2. a brief analysis of the components of the Russian, Belarusian and foreign political discourse of Russian-Belarusian integration. The methodological basis of the study was the combination of geopolitical and neorealist approaches, which made it possible to consider the USRB as an important component of the current transformations of the international system. In addition, the approaches of the theory of international relations were complemented by an institutional and systemic vision. The result of the work was the understanding that the theoretical understanding and conceptual justification for the integration of Russia and Belarus, ultimately implemented in the format of the USRB, was carried out at the level of scientific understanding of the processes of Russian-Belarusian unification and discourse, formed on the basis of the rhetoric of politicians of each state, as well as representatives of foreign thought. The basis for the theoretical understanding of the USRB was formed by areas of research that studied its institutional structure and general essence, the set of components of integration processes that expanded in accordance with historical periods, as well as the international aspects of Russian-Belarusian interaction. The presented theoretical research suggests a wide range of further applied research: starting from the regulatory framework of the State Security Service and its institutional structure, and ending with the processes of implementing union programs and determining its role in the transforming world system.
About the Author
A. V. ShebanovRussian Federation
Alexander V. Shebanov — a pplicant
Orel
References
1. The Union of Belarus and Russia: The choice is made. Minsk: Polymya; 1998. 94 р. (In Russ.).
2. Artem’eva V.N., Malikov O. P. Union of Belarus and Russia, legal nature and legal personality. Minsk; 1998. 62 p. (In Russ.).
3. The Union of Belarus and Russia: Arguments, figures, facts: 100 questions and answers. Moscow; 1999. 63 p. (In Russ.).
4. Belarus: Socio-economic potential. Minsk: Belarus’; 1998. 50 p. (In Russ.).
5. Ivanov E. M., Khromov Yu. S. Foreign economic relations between Belarus and Russia. In: Belarus: the path to new horizons. Moscow; 1996. 371 p. (In Russ.).
6. Myasnikovich M. V. Formation of financial and industrial groups in transition economies (on the example of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation). St. Petersburg: SPbGEU Publishing House; 1997. 158 p. (In Russ.).
7. On improving the legal and political foundations of the CIS (Recommendations of the Russian Academy of Sciences). Diplomatic Bulletin. 1994:19–20. URL: https://www.mid.ru/ru/press_service/dipvestnik/ (In Russ.).
8. Vinogradov S. V., Tranin A. A. CIS: interstate relations in the field of environmental protection State and law. State and law. 1994;(12):37–46. (In Russ.).
9. Egorov V., Zagorskii A. Cooperation of the CIS states in the military-political field. Moscow; 1998. 40 p. (In Russ.).
10. Nedil’ko Yu. V. The form of the state structure of the Union State of Russia and Belarus. Society and Law. 2003;(2):60–65. URL: https://mvd.ru/upload/site119/document_text/003/464/876/sl-2003–2.pdf (In Russ.).
11. Baburin S. N. Problems of law enforcement in a unitary, federal and union state. Bulletin of Omsk University. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo”. 2008;3(16):7–9. (In Russ.).
12. Kokhno P. A. The Union State. Book 6. Models of political and financial integration management. Мoscow: Nauka; 2006. 405 p. (In Russ.).
13. Vikhryan A. P. The potential of public-private partnership for property management of the Union State of Russia and Belarus. Vestnik RUDN. International Relatoins. 2010(3):73–78. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/musgip (In Russ.).
14. Bul’enkova E. L. Cultural identity as the basis of the political dialogue between Russia and Belarus. Central Russian journal of social sciences. 2009;4(13):184–186. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/msouyl (In Russ.).
15. Garmonnikov S. N. Using the experience of customs regulation of the Union State of Russia and Belarus in the formation of the Customs Union within the framework of the EurAsEC. Vestnik Rossiiskoi tamozhennoi akademii. 2010;(1):20–28. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/laatbx (In Russ.).
16. Zhuk S., Reznikova O. Economic interaction in the post-Soviet space. Kavkaz i globalizatsiya. 2006;1(1):109–123. (In Russ.).
17. 17. Deiko A. K. The Union State: The realities of integration processes. Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics. 2013;(13):19–25. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/rqqevz (In Russ.).
18. Migranyan A. A. The potential of the Union State. Greater Eurasia: Development, security, and cooperation. 2020;351–355. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/rbtbdl (In Russ.).
19. Stupakov N. V. The Union State of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus: Prospects for deepening Union integration and ensuring security (by the 20th anniversary of the Union State). International cooperation Eurasian states: politics, economics, law. 2019;(3):12–26. (In Russ.).
20. Kiselevich A. I. Commercialization of innovations — a new vector of the Union State. Contemporary Europe. 2019;(1):128–137. (In Russ.).
21. Zueva A. S. Actual problems of ensuring the economic security of the Union State. National interests: priorities and security. 2014;37(274):48–53. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/snyxbz (In Russ.).
22. Petrova I. V. The budget of the Union State: the pitfalls of its execution. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina. 2016;6(22);45–55. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/xrfqkn (In Russ.).
23. Zhavnerchik V. Constitutional and legal development of the Union State of Belarus and Russia. Scientific and Analytical Herald of IE RAS. 2019;(4):111–114. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran42019111115
24. Michulis E. F., Kuksin I. N. Formation of a unified legal space of the Union State of Belarus and Russia and its criminal law system. Nauchnye vedomosti belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. 2015;2(199):115–121. (In Russ.).
25. Silkin A. E. The right to a monthly child care allowance in the member states of the Union State of Russia and Belarus. Agrarnoe i zemel’noe pravo. 2016:115–118. (In Russ.).
26. Akhromeeva T. S., Malinetskii G. G. Sirenko S. N. Educational challenge and modernization of the Union State. Free thought. 2019;(2):139–152. URL: http://www.svom.info/entry/938-obrazovatelnyj-vyzov-i-modernizaciyasoyuznogo-gos/ (In Russ.).
27. Sirenko S. N., Malinetskii G. G. Advanced education and modernization of the Union State. Lomonosov pedagogical education journal. 2019;(1):18–31. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/zbnzvz (In Russ.).
28. Mysova T. F. Information security of the Union State. Obrazovanie i pravo. 2014;3(55)-4(56);152–156. (In Russ.).
29. Popov S. Yu. Mass media as an instrument of information policy of the Union State of Russia and Belarus (1999–2014). Cand. philol. sci. diss. Synopsis. Moscow: RUDN; 2015. (In Russ.).
30. Belov P. G. The concept and tools of security of the Union State. Bol’shaya Evraziya: razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo. Vyp. 1, Ch. 1. Moscow: INION RAN. 2018:33–34. (In Russ.).
31. Kurbanov R. A., Zhigulich V. S., Belyalova A. M. Legal bases of military-political cooperation in the Union State. Gaps in Russian legislation. Yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2017:(6):325–255. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/ykxhwg (In Russ.).
32. Gavrilina N. E., Davit’yan A. Yu. Community of cultures as the basis of the Union State of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. Kul’turnaya zhizn’ Yuga Rossii. 2015;2(57):7–11. (In Russ.).
33. Manuilova P. V. Cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus in the field of culture within the framework of the Union State. Postsovetskie issledovaniya. 2019;2(6):1420–1428. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/jxpmjh (In Russ.).
34. Abramov R. A. Development of interregional cooperation between Russia and Belarus in the educational sphere in the context of the formation of a single economic space of the Union state. Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya. Moscow: INION RAN. 2020:495–497. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/zfuhea (In Russ.).
35. Derevyanko S. V. Priority directions of integration of regional innovation systems of the Union State countries. I nnovation & Investment. 2017;(10):5–9. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/ucdjgy (In Russ.).
36. Nasuyev K. S. Results and prospects of cooperation of the internal affairs bodies of the Union State. Zakon i pravo. 2020;(7):57–59. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2073-3313-2020-10318
37. Siyanova T. V. Prospects for the development of the tourism industry in the Union State. Aktual’nye voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk. 2016;(55–1):20–25. URL: https://elibrary.ru/xhtqtf (In Russ.).
38. Boyashov A. S. The potential of the Union State in the UN system. Contemporary Europe. 2019;(1):138–147. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18500/1818–9601–2021–21–4–435–441
39. Karpilenya N. V. On the problems of neutrality in geopolitics and neutrality in ideology in the context of the national security of the Union State: a Eurasian perspective. Arkhont. 2019;1(10). (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/yzxsqh (In Russ.).
40. Bakhlova O. V., Ulyashkina E. G. The Union State in the modern political discourse of Russia. Izvestia of Saratov Uuniversity. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology. 2021;(21):435–441. URL: https://elibrary.ru/zeagjl (In Russ.).
41. Vilisov M. V. The Union State and the Union Economy: The Political Economy of Russian-Belarusian Cooperation. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. 2021;(3):106–126. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23932/25420240-2021-14-3-6
42. Sibirskaya A. V., Suleikov A. A. The impact of sanctions pressure on the economies of the Union State countries. Postsovetskie issledovaniya. 2023;6(6):695–703. URL: https://elibrary.ru/ssepvu (In Russ.).
43. Mezhevich N. M., Shimov V. V. The concept of multi-vector approach in the system of foreign policy practices of the “middle country” (on the example of Belarus). V estnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations. 2022;(15):436–450. URL: https://elibrary.ru/sjprco. (In Russ.).
44. Bakhlova O. V., Bakhlov I. V. Scenarios of the evolution of the Union State of Belarus and Russia: Values and pragmatics. Gumanitarii: aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnoi nauki i obrazovaniya. 2022;1(57):9–26. URL: https://elibrary.ru/nnhgjg (In Russ.).
45. Gavrilyuk N. P., Makarova E. M. Scenario forecast of the development of the Union State in the context of the dialogue between Russia and Belarus. The power of history — the history of power. 2022;4(38):30–40. URL: https://elibrary.ru/zhbfew (In Russ.).
46. Pakush L. V., Panasyuga N. P. Union programs of Russia and Belarus: Main directions. Vestnik Belorusskoi gosudarstvennoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii. 2023;(1):37–40. URL: https://elibrary.ru/snjrpx (In Russ.).
47. Sotnikov A. V. Programs of the Union State: a new comprehensive step towards integration. Russian foreign economic journal. 2022;(3):33–37. URL: https://elibrary.ru/tzoeas (In Russ.).
48. Kovaleva E. V. Rossiisko-belorusskie otnosheniya: tendentsii razvitiya: Cand. polit. sci. diss. Moskva; 2010;198 p. (In Russ.).
49. Dugin A. Fundamentals of geopolitics. The geopolitical future of Russia. To think in space. Moscow: Arktogeyatsentr;1999. 924 p. (In Russ.).
50. Mashko V. V. From the history of the Union State of Belarus and Russia: Budget and budgetary policy. RGGU bulletin. Sseries: Literary theory. Linguistics. Cultural studies. 2009;(17):182–190. URL: https://elibrary.ru/lhstil (In Russ.).
51. Kosov A. P. The Union State in the assessments of the pro-Western political forces of Belarus. Belarus’ v sovremennom mire: materialy XV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf., posvyashch. 95-letiyu obrazovaniya. Belarus State University, Minsk, 27 okt. 2016 g. Minsk: publishing BGU; 2016:36–38. (In Russ.).
52. Oljasz T. Another European Union. The Warsaw Voice. 1999.
53. Potocki J. SasiadStrategiczny. Wpost. 2000:88–89.
54. Lorenz A. Aufbruchaus der Talsenke? Belarus an der Swellezumneuen Jahrhundert. Osteuropa. 2000;(3):249–263.
55. Timmermann H. Der Sonderfall Belarus’ im. Timmermann Spannungs feldzwischen Rußland und Europäischer Union. 2002;(11):1436–1455.
56. Timmermann H. Koloboks Union. Belarus und Rußland am Wendepunkt. Konturen und Kontraste. Belarus sucht sein Gesicht. 2004(2):218–227.
57. Timmermann H. Putin: HärtereGangartgegenüber Minsk. Die BeziehungenRußland — Belarus imZeichen des Unionsstaats — V ertrags. Deutschland — Polen — O steuropa: deutsche und polnischeVorüberlegungenzueiner gemeinsamenOstpolitik der erweitertenEuropäischen Union. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2002:222–231.
Review
For citations:
Shebanov A.V. On the Issue of the Conceptual Justification of the Unification of the USRB in Modern Discourse. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2025;15(1):53-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-1-53-63