The Use of Oculometry and Associative Modeling in the Formation of the Content for “Image of the Future of Russia” of the Discipline “Fundamentals of Russian Statehood”
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-5-74-80
Abstract
The article shows the results of oculometric research and metaphorical associative modeling of the image of the future development of the Russian Federation in the minds of Russian students. The analysis of the oculomotor reaction of students to a battery of stimuli associated with basic needs and values of various levels is carried out. Using metaphorical associative maps and the subsequent specially organized conversation, the main intentions in building a model for the future development of Russian society are revealed. A comparison of the results of projective and instrumental diagnostics made it possible to establish the main problem field in the perception of the image of the future of the country by the studying youth: cognitive simplicity, centralization at the microlevel of life fulfillment, a low degree of readiness for social responsibility, a low level of subjectivity in the attitude towards achieving the desired future. The results of the study canserve as a methodological basis for the formation of the content and formats of work in practical classes on the topic “The image of the future of Russia” of the discipline “Fundamentals of Russian statehood”.
Keywords
image of the country’s future,
projective cognitive science,
instrumental diagnostics,
oculometry,
metaphorical associative modeling
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared with the funds of the IESI grant allocated by the INION RAS for the implementation of the project “Formation and correction of a positive image of the future of Russia” (124101700560-3).
About the Author
A. Yu. Dombrovskaya
Financial University; INION RAN
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna Yu. Dombrovskaya — Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Director, Center for Political Research, Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications; Senior Research Fellow, Moscow
References
1. Shestopal E. B., Rogach N. N. Images of the present and future of Russia in the political consciousness of its citizens. Social Sciences and modernity. 2022;(6):45–61. (In Russ.).
2. Vilkov A. A. Images of the future in political science and public discourses of modern Russia. Bulletin of Saratov University. Sociology. Political Science. 2020;20(1):64–68. (In Russ.).
3. Zheltikova I. V. The image of the future. Orel: Kartush; 2021. 163 p.
4. Komarovsky V. S. Vision of the future of the country by Russian youth: Hopes and fears. Vlast: 2021;29(5):187– 194. (In Russ.).
5. Maksimova S. G., Atyasova N. Yu., Surtayeva O. V., Shakhova E. V., Spirina A. S. The image of the future of Russia as a basis for positive identification of citizens. Society and Security Insights . 2021;4(4):77–94. (In Russ.).
6. Nestik T. A. Image the future of Russia among representatives of generation Z. Chelovek i mir.. 2018;2(2):75– 87. (In Russ.).
7. Omelchenko D. A., Maksimova, S.G., Noyanzina O. E., Shcheglova D. K. The image of the future of Russia among different generations: Conceptual foundations and results of empirical analysis. Society and Security Insights. 2021;4(4):110–140. (In Russ.).
8. Zubok Yu.A., Seliverstova N. A. Semantic components of the image of the future of the country in the representations of youth. Science. Culture. Society. 2022;28(4):56–74. (In Russ.).
9. Velikaya N. M., Novozhenina O. P. Socio-political values in the image of the future of Russian citizens as the basis for the political and economic modernization of the country. Political science issues. 2021;11(3):596– 605. (In Russ.).
10. Palitai I. S. The image of the present and future of Russia in the minds of Moscow students. Abyss (Questions of philosophy, political science and social anthropology). 2022;20(2):12–18. (In Russ.).
11. Alcock N. Z., Newcombe A. G. The perception of national power. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1970;14(3):335–343.
12. Buzan B. People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Bolder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.; 1991. 393 p.
13. Cohen R. Threat perception in international crisis. Madison: The University of Wisconsin. Social sciences and contemporary world. 2022;(6):45–61.
14. Jervis R. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University; 1976. 544 p.
15. Ognev A. S., Likhacheva E. V., Nikolaeva L. P. Oculometric manifestations of situational attitudes, cognitive schemes and life scenarios as multilevel components of character. Human capital. 2020;141(9):200–210. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25629/HC.2020.09.18
16. Brodovskaya E. V., Dombrovskaya A. Yu., Likhacheva E. V., Nikolaeva L. P., Ognev A. S., Pyrma R. V. The specifics of using airtracers in combination with a focused interview in the certification of network content. Human capital. 2021;145(1):73–82. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25629/HC.2021.01.07
Review
For citations:
Dombrovskaya A.Yu. The Use of Oculometry and Associative Modeling in the Formation of the Content for “Image of the Future of Russia” of the Discipline “Fundamentals of Russian Statehood”. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2024;14(5):74-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-5-74-80
Views:
88
Email this article 